Skip to content

[resolver] format for catalog entries #2

Description

@mromanello

Hi @hcayless

I've been thinking a bit about a JSON-based format to allow people to "register" a text service for later resolution (assuming one day this resolver will exist ;-) ).

As we discussed at Duke, we can foresee a Github-based workflow as easy as fork-push-PR. A folder services (even hosted in this repo) would allow people to add a JSON minimal description for the service they wish to register (where "register" means telling a future resolver, "hey my text service lives here etc.").

Here a fictional entry for Pietro'd current DTS implementation, just as a way of starting a discussion about a possible format.

(content of services/betamasaheft.json)

{
        "endpoint": "http://betamasaheft.eu/api/dts",
        "protocol": "dts",
        "name": "Beta maṣāḥǝft",
        "contact": "mailto:pietro.liuzzo@uni-hamburg.de",
        "status": "beta"
    }

where status could take values: alpha, beta, demo, experimental and protocol either cts or dts.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions