Skip to content

Bring Cabra/OpenClaw to LifeOS operational readiness after update #108

Description

@marcusglee11

Objective

Bring Cabra/OpenClaw back to the required LifeOS operational authority level after the OpenClaw update by removing runtime drift and proving reconstructable governance readiness.

Hermes review verdict: Cabra is usable for supervised coordination, but not yet at LifeOS-required operational authority level. The gap is trustable, reconstructable execution: orientation access, config/model drift, stale automation, and insufficient readiness evidence.

Current observed state

  • OpenClaw runtime: 2026.4.27; npm update available 2026.5.3-1 but not run.
  • Live session model: openai-codex/gpt-5.5.
  • Config/default drift: main agent config appears to prefer openai-codex/gpt-5.4 while current session uses gpt-5.5.
  • Memory backend: qmd; 37 memory files found under workspace memory.
  • Gateway config validates cleanly.
  • LifeOS repo reachable at /mnt/c/Users/cabra/Projects/LifeOS through shell.
  • First-class OpenClaw read tool is sandboxed to workspace and cannot read /mnt/c/... mandatory LifeOS orientation files.
  • lifeos-read skill references scripts/lifeos.sh, but that script is not present in the workspace.
  • Cron: 9 jobs exist, all disabled; several have stale delivery warnings.
  • HEARTBEAT.md is empty/comment-only.
  • TOOLS.md is still mostly template content.
  • Native subagent allowlist exposes only main.
  • Messaging posture appears mostly right: WhatsApp denied/disabled, Slack channel disabled, Telegram scoped, Webchat allowed.
  • Dispatch inbox is empty except .gitkeep.

Required outcome

A fresh Cabra session can independently:

  1. Read mandatory LifeOS orientation sources through an approved/repeatable lane.
  2. Resolve and report the intended model/fallback chain reproducibly.
  3. Access memory and retrieve relevant operating directives.
  4. Verify LifeOS dispatch inbox and current WIP state.
  5. Prove messaging/write gates are fail-closed where required.
  6. Run a single readiness smoke gate and produce timestamped evidence.
  7. Explain cron/heartbeat/tooling state without stale ambiguity.

Plan

Phase 0 — Evidence snapshot / no-change baseline

  • Capture current OpenClaw version, gateway status, model status, config hash, enabled plugins, channels, cron jobs, node status, and active sessions.
  • Capture current LifeOS orientation attempt using both first-class read path and shell fallback.
  • Record all known failures as baseline, not regressions.

Acceptance evidence:

  • Timestamped baseline artifact under artifacts/evidence/ or equivalent canonical evidence path.
  • Includes redacted config excerpts, no secrets.

Phase 1 — Repair LifeOS orientation access

Problem: mandatory orientation currently depends on shell fallback; the approved skill path is broken.

Tasks:

  • Decide canonical LifeOS local path for Cabra/OpenClaw reads.
  • Repair lifeos-read skill so it works in the actual runtime, or retire/replace it with an explicitly supported local orientation command.
  • Ensure the mandatory files are readable through the approved lane:
    • config/tasks/backlog.yaml
    • docs/11_admin/LIFEOS_STATE.md
    • config/governance/delegation_envelope.yaml
    • artifacts/dispatch/inbox/
  • Document whether /mnt/c/... shell fallback is allowed, temporary, or forbidden.

Acceptance evidence:

  • Fresh Cabra session reads all four orientation sources without ad hoc path guessing.
  • Smoke output lists exact paths/tools used.
  • No sandbox bypass surprise.

Phase 2 — Resolve model/config drift

Problem: live session uses gpt-5.5; config appears to define gpt-5.4 for main.

Tasks:

  • Inspect effective model resolution order: config default, agent override, session override, env override, runtime override.
  • Decide intended primary model for Cabra main.
  • Align config/session behavior to the intended model.
  • Keep fallbacks explicit.

Acceptance evidence:

  • Fresh session status shows intended primary and fallbacks.
  • Config readback matches intended behavior or documents intentional runtime override.
  • Drift note closed with cause identified.

Phase 3 — Create LifeOS readiness smoke gate

Build a repeatable readiness command/procedure that proves Cabra can safely operate as COO.

Smoke must check:

  • OpenClaw/gateway health.
  • Effective model and fallbacks.
  • Memory backend/search availability.
  • LifeOS mandatory orientation read.
  • Dispatch inbox visibility.
  • GitHub bus visibility/auth status for canonical control-plane work.
  • Messaging send policy / channel gates.
  • Cron inventory state.
  • Native subagent/EA routing capability.
  • No paired nodes, or paired-node state if later enabled.

Acceptance evidence:

  • One command/procedure documented.
  • One timestamped smoke report with pass/fail rows.
  • Failures are explicit and actionable.

Phase 4 — Clean cron/heartbeat/tooling authority

Problem: disabled/stale automation and empty canonical-looking files create false confidence.

Tasks:

  • Inventory all cron jobs.
  • Classify each: keep disabled, delete stale, repair, or explicitly re-enable.
  • Do not re-enable unattended automation without Boss/CEO approval.
  • Populate HEARTBEAT.md with actual heartbeat policy/cadence or mark it intentionally empty/non-operational.
  • Populate TOOLS.md with real local surfaces/path notes, or mark it explicitly non-authoritative template.

Acceptance evidence:

  • Cron before/after inventory with purpose and disposition for every job.
  • HEARTBEAT.md and TOOLS.md readback included.
  • No stale route warnings left unexplained.

Phase 5 — Subagent / EA routing readiness

Problem: native subagent allowlist exposes only main, limiting conductor/worker architecture.

Tasks:

  • Decide required bounded specialist lanes: e.g. quick/read-only, review, EA/coding-agent bridge, no-external-send worker.
  • Add only minimal allowed agents with explicit tool/send/write policy.
  • Verify unauthorized lanes remain blocked.

Acceptance evidence:

  • Agent list readback after changes.
  • Positive test for intended lane availability.
  • Negative test for unauthorized send/write where applicable.

Phase 6 — Messaging safety verification

Tasks:

  • Verify WhatsApp remains denied unless explicitly approved.
  • Verify Slack channel disabled state.
  • Verify Telegram is scoped to allowed sender/group policy.
  • Verify Webchat remains allowed.
  • Avoid live external send tests unless explicitly approved; prefer dry-run/policy readback.

Acceptance evidence:

  • Redacted messaging config/policy snapshot.
  • Dry-run or policy readback proving deny/allow gates.

Phase 7 — Update canary decision

Problem: update exists, but updating first may obscure known drift.

Tasks:

  • Compare OpenClaw 2026.5.3-1 release notes against known failures.
  • If relevant, create pre-update snapshot, canary plan, rollback plan.
  • Only run update after explicit approval.

Acceptance evidence:

  • Release relevance note.
  • Pre-update baseline.
  • Canary + rollback procedure.
  • Post-update smoke, if update is approved and executed.

Definition of done

  • Fresh Cabra session passes the LifeOS readiness smoke, or fails only on explicitly accepted non-blockers.
  • Required model/fallback behavior is reproducible.
  • Mandatory orientation is reliable and not dependent on hidden shell improvisation.
  • Cron/heartbeat/tool authority state is documented and cleaned.
  • Messaging gates are proven fail-closed.
  • Subagent/EA routing readiness is either implemented or explicitly deferred with rationale.
  • Evidence is stored in canonical LifeOS evidence location.

Risks

  • Config changes may require OpenClaw restart; use safe restart path only.
  • Updating OpenClaw before resolving known drift may create confounding failures.
  • Expanding subagent access can broaden authority accidentally; keep roles narrow.
  • Live external messaging tests can violate send policy; use dry-runs/policy readback unless approved.

Recommended owner split

  • Cabra/COO: coordination, issue tracking, evidence requirements, status reconciliation.
  • EA/coding agent: implementation of skill/config/script changes.
  • Boss/CEO: approve config changes that affect providers, external messaging, autonomy, or update execution.

Source

Prompted by Cabra self-status report and Hermes CLI review on 2026-05-04.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions