I think the edition is closer to 1892 than 1882 and have adjusted the header and added a new link to the 1892 scan and an editorial note.
This has always been a sourcing question and I think that for a while only 1882 was online, so I went with that. Just found a verse issue that suggests 1892 is better but I'm stumped.
I think the edition is closer to 1892 than 1882 and have adjusted the header and added a new link to the 1892 scan and an editorial note.
This has always been a sourcing question and I think that for a while only 1882 was online, so I went with that. Just found a verse issue that suggests 1892 is better but I'm stumped.