-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
[TEST] Low coverage on utility_functions.py #830
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
Effort > Moderate 🐕Mid-sized tasks estimated to take a few days to a few weeks.Mid-sized tasks estimated to take a few days to a few weeks.Impact > Minor 🔷Small, backward compatible change. Treat like a patch release (e.g., 0.5.8 → 0.5.9).Small, backward compatible change. Treat like a patch release (e.g., 0.5.8 → 0.5.9).
Milestone
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Effort > Moderate 🐕Mid-sized tasks estimated to take a few days to a few weeks.Mid-sized tasks estimated to take a few days to a few weeks.Impact > Minor 🔷Small, backward compatible change. Treat like a patch release (e.g., 0.5.8 → 0.5.9).Small, backward compatible change. Treat like a patch release (e.g., 0.5.8 → 0.5.9).
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
Projects
Status
In progress
Description
I'm working on this. Most likely this will require 2 or 3 PRs since the missing lines cover a variety of different functions (I/O, patsy, model diagnostics).
Is your feature request aligned with the scope of the package?
Describe the solution you'd like, or your current workaround.
No response
Do you have any additional supporting notes?
No response