allow data-f-foreach to have access to enumerated ranges for time-based models

[mmrj]

it would be nice to have something similar allowed (syntax negotiable, etc.):

<table>
	<th>Initial Sales</th>
     <tbody data-f-foreach="r in region">
         <tr data-f-foreach="p in product">
             <td><%= r %></td><td><%= p %></td><td><%= Initial Sales[r,p] %></td>
         </tr>
     </tbody>
 </table>

for the case where /v2/model/introspect for this model returns

  "ranges": [
    {
      "indices": [
        "apple",
        "orange",
        "banana"
      ],
      "name": "product",
      "saved": false,
      "type": "Subscript Range"
    },
    {
      "indices": [
        "east",
        "west"
      ],
      "name": "region",
      "saved": false,
      "type": "Subscript Range"
    }
  ],
  "variables": [
    {
      "name": "Initial Sales",
      "saved": false,
      "subscripts": [
        "region",
        "product"
      ],
      "type": "Auxiliary"
    },
]

(currently, this only works if region and product are separately model variables)

[narenranjit]

@mmrj Haven't tried this, but shouldn't you be able to use the region[*] syntax here to loop through?

[mmrj]

sample testing code, which doesn't work:

 <table>
 	<th>Initial Sales</th>
 	<tbody data-f-foreach="(region, rvalue) in Initial Sales[*,*]">
 		<tr data-f-foreach="(product, pvalue) in Initial Sales[<%= region %>,*]"><td> rvalue: <%= rvalue %>, pvalue: <%= pvalue %>, region: <%= region %>, product: <%= product %></td></tr>
 	</tbody>
 </table>

for reference,

GET https://api.forio.com/v2/run/mj-unittest/vensim_arrays/0000015af132af5966650d159232430b7524/variables/?include=Initial%20Sales[east,*]

returns

{"Initial Sales[east,*]":{"east":{"banana":[1050],"apple":[1000],"orange":[1100]}}}

however,

GET https://api.forio.com/v2/run/mj-unittest/vensim_arrays/0000015af132af5966650d159232430b7524/variables/Initial%20Sales[east,*]

returns

{
  "east": {
    "banana": [
      1050
    ],
    "apple": [
      1000
    ],
    "orange": [
      1100
    ]
  }
}

@narenranjit this matches what i expect from the Run API in both cases; but the data-f-foreach seems to be expecting the second one ?