diff --git a/tests/consensus/lstar/fork_choice/test_equivocation.py b/tests/consensus/lstar/fork_choice/test_equivocation.py
index 68d16144e..871aa5f0a 100644
--- a/tests/consensus/lstar/fork_choice/test_equivocation.py
+++ b/tests/consensus/lstar/fork_choice/test_equivocation.py
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ def test_same_slot_equivocating_attesters_count_once(
     - one vote at slot 3 targets fork_b from V0, V1, V3, V4.
     - V0 and V1 equivocate by voting on both forks at the same slot.
     - the two votes tie on slot, so the larger attestation-data root wins.
-    - the fork_b vote carries the larger root.
+    - the fork_a vote carries the larger root.
 
     When
     ----
@@ -267,10 +267,10 @@ def test_same_slot_equivocating_attesters_count_once(
 
     Then
     ----
-    - V0 and V1 count once, toward fork_b.
-    - fork_b has effective weight 4 from V0, V1, V3, V4.
-    - fork_a has effective weight 1 from V2.
-    - head is fork_b.
+    - V0 and V1 count once, toward fork_a.
+    - fork_a has effective weight 3 from V0, V1, V2.
+    - fork_b has effective weight 2 from V3, V4.
+    - head is fork_a.
     - no slot is justified by the below-threshold votes.
     """
     fork_choice_test(
@@ -317,8 +317,8 @@ def test_same_slot_equivocating_attesters_count_once(
             TickStep(
                 time=16,
                 checks=StoreChecks(
-                    head_slot=Slot(3),
-                    head_root_label="fork_b",
+                    head_slot=Slot(2),
+                    head_root_label="fork_a",
                     latest_justified_slot=Slot(0),
                     latest_finalized_slot=Slot(0),
                     latest_known_aggregated_target_slots=[Slot(2), Slot(3)],
@@ -327,13 +327,13 @@ def test_same_slot_equivocating_attesters_count_once(
                             validator=ValidatorIndex(0),
                             location="known",
                             attestation_slot=Slot(3),
-                            target_slot=Slot(3),
+                            target_slot=Slot(2),
                         ),
                         AttestationCheck(
                             validator=ValidatorIndex(1),
                             location="known",
                             attestation_slot=Slot(3),
-                            target_slot=Slot(3),
+                            target_slot=Slot(2),
                         ),
                         AttestationCheck(
                             validator=ValidatorIndex(2),
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ def test_equivocation_head_independent_of_arrival_order_a_then_b(
     - V1 backs fork_a alone; V2 backs fork_b alone.
     - without V0 the two forks tie one-to-one, so V0's vote decides the head.
     - the two votes tie on slot, so the larger attestation-data root wins.
-    - the fork_a vote carries the larger root.
+    - the fork_b vote carries the larger root.
 
     When
     ----
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ def test_equivocation_head_independent_of_arrival_order_a_then_b(
     - V0 counts once, toward the larger-root fork.
     - the larger-root fork has effective weight 2.
     - the smaller-root fork has effective weight 1.
-    - head is fork_a.
+    - head is fork_b.
     - no slot is justified by the below-threshold votes.
     """
     fork_choice_test(
@@ -428,8 +428,8 @@ def test_equivocation_head_independent_of_arrival_order_a_then_b(
             TickStep(
                 time=16,
                 checks=StoreChecks(
-                    head_slot=Slot(2),
-                    head_root_label="fork_a",
+                    head_slot=Slot(3),
+                    head_root_label="fork_b",
                     latest_justified_slot=Slot(0),
                     latest_finalized_slot=Slot(0),
                     attestation_checks=[
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ def test_equivocation_head_independent_of_arrival_order_a_then_b(
                             validator=ValidatorIndex(0),
                             location="known",
                             attestation_slot=Slot(3),
-                            target_slot=Slot(2),
+                            target_slot=Slot(3),
                         ),
                     ],
                 ),
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ def test_equivocation_head_independent_of_arrival_order_b_then_a(
     - V1 backs fork_a alone; V2 backs fork_b alone.
     - without V0 the two forks tie one-to-one, so V0's vote decides the head.
     - the two votes tie on slot, so the larger attestation-data root wins.
-    - the fork_a vote carries the larger root.
+    - the fork_b vote carries the larger root.
 
     When
     ----
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ def test_equivocation_head_independent_of_arrival_order_b_then_a(
     - V0 counts once, toward the larger-root fork.
     - the larger-root fork has effective weight 2.
     - the smaller-root fork has effective weight 1.
-    - head is fork_a, matching the opposite arrival order.
+    - head is fork_b, matching the opposite arrival order.
     - no slot is justified by the below-threshold votes.
     """
     fork_choice_test(
@@ -514,8 +514,8 @@ def test_equivocation_head_independent_of_arrival_order_b_then_a(
             TickStep(
                 time=16,
                 checks=StoreChecks(
-                    head_slot=Slot(2),
-                    head_root_label="fork_a",
+                    head_slot=Slot(3),
+                    head_root_label="fork_b",
                     latest_justified_slot=Slot(0),
                     latest_finalized_slot=Slot(0),
                     attestation_checks=[
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ def test_equivocation_head_independent_of_arrival_order_b_then_a(
                             validator=ValidatorIndex(0),
                             location="known",
                             attestation_slot=Slot(3),
-                            target_slot=Slot(2),
+                            target_slot=Slot(3),
                         ),
                     ],
                 ),