is collections entry correct at readme file?

[userquin]

This configuration seems to be wrong, we need collections as direct icon child (testing tresjs apps/lab when migrating to tsdown) all json collections in the nuxt server.mjs):

export default defineNuxtConfig({
  modules: ['@nuxt/icon'],
  icon: {
    collections: ['uil', 'mdi'] // <== SHOULD BE HERE?
    serverBundle: {
      collections: ['uil', 'mdi'] // <== IS THIS FINE?
    }
  }
})

including collections inside serverBundle

including collections as direct child

[rafasoares]

From what I understand, they serve different purposes:

• icon.collections: List of known icon collections name. Used to resolve collection name ambiguity. e.g. simple-icons-github -> simple-icons:github instead of simple:icons-github. ¹
• icon.serverBundle.collections: collections that will be bundled when building the server.²

What you're seeing in the first screenshot is the default value for icon.collections¹:

When not provided, will use the full Iconify collection list.

The bundled collections wouldn't be in server.mjs, it would be in a separate chunk, i.e. .output/server/chunks/_/icons.mjs.

Footnotes

1. https://github.com/nuxt/icon/blob/7cafddc2f5bb91bf399e72ebbb03b79562e8c95d/src/schema-types.ts#L77-L86 ↩ ↩²

2. https://github.com/nuxt/icon/blob/7cafddc2f5bb91bf399e72ebbb03b79562e8c95d/src/types.ts#L84-L87 ↩