docs(adr): ADR-0130 status is Accepted, in ADR-0125's spelling, dated by its landing merge (#15704)

The record's Status line said "Proposed — awaiting the maintainer's hand-merge,
which is itself the acceptance act". A reader can only reach that line because
the file is on `main`, i.e. because the hand-merge already happened, so the
sentence disproves itself and names an event that can never occur again. It is
also read as a gate: one seat has "re-read the Status line, never assume" in its
standing check-in, which makes it a pause with no end condition.

The line now carries the state and the act only, in the spelling ADR-0125
already uses: the landing merge, its PR, its commit and its date.

Landing reading (the ORIGINAL landing, not the 2026-09-03 anchor migration):
`git log --follow --diff-filter=A` and the REST commit list agree on
`682d03ba7` (2026-09-01, `added` this path), whose message names PR #14151;
`GET /pulls/14151` reports `merged: true`, `base.ref: main`,
`merge_commit_sha: 682d03b...`, `merged_by.login: os-zhuang` — a human
approver, which is the precondition the ruling sets for treating the merge as
the acceptance act.

Part of #15453


Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: claude[bot]

docs/adr/0130-release-artifact-as-co-ownership-boundary.md

@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
 # ADR-0130: The release artifact is the co-ownership boundary — one artifact, N packages
 
-**Status**: Proposed (2026-09-01) — awaiting the maintainer's hand-merge, which is itself the
-acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive #14). ⛔ Nothing below is settled until
-this record merges; the implementation cards are cut **from** the merged ADR, never ahead of it.
+**Status**: Accepted (2026-09-01) — accepted by the merge that landed it on `main` ([#14151](https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/14151), commit `682d03ba7`), which is itself the acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive #14).
 **Scope bounded by the 2026-09-02 addendum**
 ([#14487](https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/14487)): the permission matrix
 §1.3(a) measures is **not** part of this boundary's payoff — permission sets stay whole in the