diff --git a/.github/workflows/lint.yml b/.github/workflows/lint.yml
index 0ab076bdba..9156abfbc0 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/lint.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/lint.yml
@@ -2867,24 +2867,28 @@ jobs:
       # line, driven against REAL captured vitest logs of the incident's own
       # test file — one timeout, one assertion, byte-identical FAIL lines and
       # opposite diagnoses, which is the confusion that produced a confidently
-      # wrong card (#10112) and cost a whole dispatch; and (2) the cross-PR
+      # wrong card (#10112) and cost a whole dispatch; (2) the cross-PR
       # aggregation files exactly ONE anchor issue at >= 2 DISTINCT PRs,
       # REFRESHES it on the next ejection instead of filing a second, and files
       # none for two different keys or for one PR ejecting twice. The refresh
       # leg is driven as a PAIR — run 2's world is built from run 1's output —
       # because idempotency is a property of the pair and a hand-written marker
-      # would prove each half while leaving the two runs free to disagree.
+      # would prove each half while leaving the two runs free to disagree; and
+      # (3) the operative guidance prose (the timeout-vs-assertion rule, its
+      # named exception, and the boundary sentence that the re-queue allowance
+      # is governed elsewhere) is present in the posted body, one assertion per
+      # claim over the WHOLE body, not the excerpt.
       #
       # Its --self-test runs first and is the half that stops the battery
-      # rotting into decoration: it mutates the shipped script fourteen ways —
+      # rotting into decoration: it mutates the shipped script twenty ways —
       # drop the reason lookahead, test the FAIL pattern before the reason
       # pattern (which silently loses every assertion), count runs instead of
       # distinct PRs, always create instead of refreshing, drop the sighting
-      # markers, downgrade each anti-no-op announcement to an info line, and
-      # more — and requires the battery to go RED for each, naming the scenario
-      # that catches it. A mutation whose anchor no longer exists is a failure
-      # too, so a rewrite of the workflow cannot leave the mutations silently
-      # matching nothing.
+      # markers, downgrade each anti-no-op announcement to an info line, drop
+      # each half of the guidance prose, and more — and requires the battery to
+      # go RED for each, naming the scenario that catches it. A mutation whose
+      # anchor no longer exists is a failure too, so a rewrite of the workflow
+      # cannot leave the mutations silently matching nothing.
       #
       # Invoked as `node` rather than through a `pnpm check:*` alias, same
       # reason as the step above: see the GATE INVOCATION IDIOM note at the top
diff --git a/scripts/check-merge-queue-triage-outcome.mjs b/scripts/check-merge-queue-triage-outcome.mjs
index e258d3ef8b..89db8e44c9 100644
--- a/scripts/check-merge-queue-triage-outcome.mjs
+++ b/scripts/check-merge-queue-triage-outcome.mjs
@@ -505,6 +505,24 @@ const excerptLines = (r) => {
   return out;
 };
 
+/**
+ * The whole posted body, for assertions about the operative GUIDANCE PROSE
+ * (the timeout-vs-assertion rule, its named exception, and the boundary
+ * sentence) rather than the extracted excerpt.
+ *
+ * This deliberately does NOT go through `excerptLines`: that helper is
+ * scoped to code-fence content precisely so the comment's own explanatory
+ * prose -- which names both `FAIL` and `AssertionError` -- cannot satisfy an
+ * assertion about the EXTRACTION (see its docblock). The guidance prose
+ * lives outside every fence, so `excerptLines` cannot see it at all; going
+ * through it here would silently pass on a body that shipped `excerptLines`
+ * still finds the FAIL/reason pair, but with the guidance paragraph deleted.
+ * The question this accessor answers is different and does not have that
+ * failure mode: is the guidance text the workflow composes into every
+ * comment actually present in what it posted?
+ */
+const guidanceProse = (r) => postedBody(r);
+
 // ── Scenarios ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
 const REFUSED = httpError(503, 'No server is currently available to service your request.');
@@ -547,11 +565,19 @@ function scenarios(root) {
       world: () => base(),
       check(r, t) {
         const lines = excerptLines(r);
+        const prose = guidanceProse(r);
         return [
           t(lines.some((l) => l.includes(`FAIL  ${KEY_A}`)), 'the FAIL line is excerpted'),
           t(lines.some((l) => l.startsWith('↳ 失败原因:') && l.includes('Error: Test timed out in 1ms.')),
             `the reason line is excerpted and labelled, got: ${JSON.stringify(lines)}`),
           t(!lines.some((l) => l.includes('AssertionError')), 'no assertion is reported for a timeout log'),
+          // ── operative guidance prose, read over the WHOLE posted body ──
+          t(prose.includes('负载/时序') && prose.includes('真实的行为改变'),
+            'the timeout-vs-assertion rule is present in the posted body: timeout -> load/timing, assertion -> real behaviour change'),
+          t(prose.includes('实验自身的有效性前提') && prose.includes('时长、一个时间戳、一个耗时计数'),
+            'the named exception is present in the posted body: an assertion about the experiment\'s own validity premise (a duration, a timestamp, an elapsed count) reads like a timeout'),
+          t(prose.includes('后者由别处管'),
+            'the boundary sentence is present in the posted body: this only changes how a red is read, not which tests may be re-queued'),
         ];
       },
     },
@@ -1213,6 +1239,33 @@ const MUTATIONS = [
     to: "  core.info('triage comment for this run already exists \u2014 skipping.');",
     expect: ['A5'],
   },
+  {
+    id: 'M17',
+    what: 'the timeout-vs-assertion rule silently loses its "load/timing" half',
+    from: '\u8d1f\u8f7d/\u65f6\u5e8f',
+    to: '',
+    expect: ['E1'],
+    // A1 files an anchor from the same triage comment but never reads the
+    // guidance prose -- the control that proves this mutation is caught by
+    // the new prose assertion, not by every scenario reacting to any change.
+    keepGreen: ['A1'],
+  },
+  {
+    id: 'M18',
+    what: 'the named exception silently loses the phrase identifying its own object -- the experiment\'s own validity premise',
+    from: '\u5b9e\u9a8c\u81ea\u8eab\u7684\u6709\u6548\u6027\u524d\u63d0',
+    to: '',
+    expect: ['E1'],
+    keepGreen: ['A1'],
+  },
+  {
+    id: 'M19',
+    what: 'the boundary sentence -- this only changes how a red is read, not which tests may be re-queued -- silently drops',
+    from: '\u540e\u8005\u7531\u522b\u5904\u7ba1',
+    to: '',
+    expect: ['E1'],
+    keepGreen: ['A1'],
+  },
 ];
 
 // Returned by `selfTest()` only after its verdict is printed. The dispatch