diff --git a/.changeset/6751-flex-props-envelope-lift.md b/.changeset/6751-flex-props-envelope-lift.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..360fc93dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.changeset/6751-flex-props-envelope-lift.md
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+---
+---
+
+Fixes the `flex` node in `packages/types/examples/data-display-examples.json`, which authored
+its layout configuration under a `props` envelope (`props: { direction: 'col', gap: 4 }`).
+`SchemaRenderer` hoists `properties.*` onto the node and spreads `props` as React props
+instead, so a renderer declared `({ schema })` — the ordinary component-renderer shape, which
+`flex.tsx` has — never reads the envelope. The example therefore rendered with the default
+`row` direction and the default gap while presenting itself as a column with `gap: 4`. The
+two keys are lifted onto the node, where `FlexSchema` declares them; `props` is not renamed,
+because renaming it to `properties` would be a second spelling for something the schema
+already declares at node level.
+
+Declared as releasing nothing: `packages/types/examples/**` is not in that package's
+published `files`, and the accompanying pin is a test. No published behaviour changes.
diff --git a/packages/types/examples/data-display-examples.json b/packages/types/examples/data-display-examples.json
index a5793f2ad..613aaf3e7 100644
--- a/packages/types/examples/data-display-examples.json
+++ b/packages/types/examples/data-display-examples.json
@@ -245,10 +245,8 @@
   "compositeExample": {
     "type": "flex",
     "id": "user-profile-card",
-    "props": {
-      "direction": "col",
-      "gap": 4
-    },
+    "direction": "col",
+    "gap": 4,
     "children": [
       {
         "type": "avatar",
diff --git a/packages/types/src/__tests__/flex-props-envelope-lift-6751.test.ts b/packages/types/src/__tests__/flex-props-envelope-lift-6751.test.ts
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a4d6a06f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/packages/types/src/__tests__/flex-props-envelope-lift-6751.test.ts
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+/**
+ * ObjectUI
+ * Copyright (c) 2024-present ObjectStack Inc.
+ *
+ * This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the
+ * LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
+ */
+
+/**
+ * objectui#6751 — the `flex` node in `data-display-examples.json` declares its
+ * layout keys at NODE level, not inside a `props` envelope.
+ *
+ * ## What was wrong
+ *
+ * `compositeExample` authored
+ *
+ *     { "type": "flex", "props": { "direction": "col", "gap": 4 } }
+ *
+ * `SchemaRenderer` hoists `properties.*` onto the node and spreads `props` as
+ * React props instead, so a renderer declared `({ schema })` — the ordinary
+ * component-renderer shape, which `flex.tsx` has — never sees the envelope.
+ * The example therefore rendered with the DEFAULT `row` direction and the
+ * DEFAULT gap while presenting itself as a column with `gap: 4`. The fix is to
+ * lift the two keys onto the node, which is where `FlexSchema` declares them;
+ * it is NOT to rename `props` to `properties`.
+ *
+ * ## Why the assertions here are structural rather than acceptance-shaped
+ *
+ * `BaseSchema` is `.passthrough()`, so the broken document parsed GREEN through
+ * every schema in this package and would keep doing so. Acceptance cannot tell
+ * "lifted" from "still under `props`, admitted unexamined". What separates the
+ * two is the parsed VALUE:
+ *
+ *     fixture state          FlexSchema.parse(node).direction / .gap / 'props' in node
+ *     props envelope         'row' (default) / 2 (default) / true
+ *     lifted onto the node   'col'           / 4           / false
+ *
+ * ## The fence this file must not cross (objectui#6751 triage, twice)
+ *
+ * Three same-shaped occurrences elsewhere in the repo are DELIBERATE
+ * counter-examples — `skills/objectui/rules/protocol.md`'s `card`, and
+ * `skills/objectui/guides/schema-expressions.md`'s `card` and `text`, each
+ * marked wrong where it stands. The walk below is scoped to this one fixture
+ * for that reason: a repo-wide "no node carries `props`" assertion would make
+ * the teaching material fail.
+ */
+import { readFileSync } from 'node:fs';
+import { resolve } from 'node:path';
+import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest';
+import { FlexSchema, LayoutSchema } from '../zod/layout.zod';
+
+const ROOT = resolve(__dirname, '../../../..');
+const FIXTURE = 'packages/types/examples/data-display-examples.json';
+
+/** The fixture is an arbitrary JSON document, so it is read as one. */
+type JsonObject = { [key: string]: unknown };
+
+function readFixture(): JsonObject {
+  return JSON.parse(readFileSync(resolve(ROOT, FIXTURE), 'utf8')) as JsonObject;
+}
+
+/** `doc[key]`, refused loudly rather than read as `undefined` if it is not an object. */
+function objectAt(doc: JsonObject, key: string): JsonObject {
+  const value = doc[key];
+  if (value === null || typeof value !== 'object' || Array.isArray(value)) {
+    throw new Error(`${FIXTURE}: expected an object at \`${key}\`, got ${JSON.stringify(value)}`);
+  }
+  return value as JsonObject;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Every object in `doc` that carries a `type` AND a `props` key, reported as
+ * `type` + JSON path. The `element:*` namespace is excluded because those
+ * renderers read `props` by design (`readProps` merges both bags); every other
+ * `type` is a component-renderer type, which never sees the envelope.
+ */
+function envelopeSites(doc: unknown, path = '$'): string[] {
+  const hits: string[] = [];
+  if (Array.isArray(doc)) {
+    doc.forEach((v, i) => hits.push(...envelopeSites(v, `${path}[${i}]`)));
+    return hits;
+  }
+  if (doc === null || typeof doc !== 'object') return hits;
+  const node = doc as Record<string, unknown>;
+  if (typeof node.type === 'string' && !node.type.startsWith('element:')
+      && Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(node, 'props')) {
+    hits.push(`${path} (type=${node.type})`);
+  }
+  for (const [k, v] of Object.entries(node)) hits.push(...envelopeSites(v, `${path}.${k}`));
+  return hits;
+}
+
+describe('objectui#6751 — flex layout keys sit on the node, not under `props`', () => {
+  it('compositeExample parses through FlexSchema with direction/gap as authored', () => {
+    const node = objectAt(readFixture(), 'compositeExample');
+    expect(node.type).toBe('flex');
+
+    const parsed = FlexSchema.parse(node);
+    // Under the envelope these two read the SCHEMA DEFAULTS ('row' / 2), which
+    // is precisely the bug: the document says one thing and renders another.
+    expect(parsed.direction).toBe('col');
+    expect(parsed.gap).toBe(4);
+    // `.passthrough()` carries unknown keys through, so a surviving `props` on
+    // the PARSED node is the direct reading that the envelope is still there.
+    expect(Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(parsed, 'props')).toBe(false);
+  });
+
+  it('compositeExample parses the same way through the published LayoutSchema union', () => {
+    const parsed = LayoutSchema.parse(objectAt(readFixture(), 'compositeExample')) as JsonObject;
+    expect(parsed.type).toBe('flex');
+    expect(parsed.direction).toBe('col');
+    expect(parsed.gap).toBe(4);
+    expect(Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(parsed, 'props')).toBe(false);
+  });
+
+  it('no component-renderer node anywhere in the fixture carries a `props` envelope', () => {
+    expect(envelopeSites(readFixture())).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  it('positive control — the walk above catches an envelope when one is present', () => {
+    // Without this, the zero on the previous assertion could come from a walker
+    // that never reports anything.
+    const doc = readFixture();
+    objectAt(doc, 'compositeExample').props = { direction: 'col', gap: 4 };
+    expect(envelopeSites(doc)).toEqual(['$.compositeExample (type=flex)']);
+  });
+
+  it('negative control — `properties` and the `element:*` carve-out are not flagged', () => {
+    // `properties` is the bag SchemaRenderer DOES hoist, and `element:*` reads
+    // `props` by design; flagging either would make the zero above meaningless.
+    expect(envelopeSites({ type: 'card', properties: { title: 'Customer Summary' } })).toEqual([]);
+    expect(envelopeSites({ type: 'element:div', props: { className: 'p-4' } })).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  it('negative control — the lift left the rest of the node untouched', () => {
+    const node = objectAt(readFixture(), 'compositeExample');
+    expect(node.id).toBe('user-profile-card');
+    const children = node.children as JsonObject[];
+    expect(children.map((c) => c.type)).toEqual(['avatar', 'statistic', 'badge', 'list']);
+    expect(children[0]).toMatchObject({
+      type: 'avatar', alt: 'User Avatar', fallback: 'JD', size: 'lg',
+    });
+  });
+});