Skip to content

Make removing fields easier to understand #124

@ilyakooo0

Description

@ilyakooo0

Reports like this:

  • Values are no longer limited to the following types:

    • Array
  • The property was previously explicitly defined. It is now implicitly described by the catch-all "additional properties" case.

  • The property may not be present.

Should probably be "Field probably removed" with a subelement explaining why we think that (the quote above)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions