[pull] master from web-platform-tests:master#2254
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Follow up to CL:7853073 that more correctly applies the max possible contribution from an auto placed subgrid to every track. A new `LargestAutoPlacedSubgridContribution` helper was added to compute the largest per-track extra margin from the subgrid's accumulated start/end extra margins and gutter-size delta, accounting for the different kinds of subgrid span sizes. For auto-placed subgrids, that contribution is multiplied by each set's track count and broadcast to every set in the parent track collection. This allowed us to removed the need to create a set to track mapping as we were doing before. We have a few new test passes, and various expected files needed to be updated for the new expected behavior. Bug: 343257585 Change-Id: I20aebc0abddd6c30ee7e1ac12317b2c80470d6fc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7903772 Reviewed-by: Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Alison Maher <almaher@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1644835}
Document::IsFocusAllowed() used to return early based on the target frame being a main frame or having transient user activation. In this way, a restricted iframe could initiate a focus call whose target was the main frame or an activated frame and bypass its own focus-without-user-activation policy. Now when BlockingFocusWithoutUserActivation is enabled, check transient user activation on the initiator frame instead. Keep the legacy target-based main-frame/activation short-circuit only for the feature-disabled path, so existing behavior is preserved when enforcement is off. There's an issue filed on WHATWG/HTML about this here whatwg/html#12470 Bug: 513330788, 40095111 Change-Id: I7b050ae1c46ca3400c0fcc0bcce4cfd04594d7ee Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7856510 Reviewed-by: Jacques Newman <janewman@microsoft.com> Commit-Queue: Fernando Fiori <ffiori@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Clark <daniec@microsoft.com> Auto-Submit: Fernando Fiori <ffiori@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1644919}
This aligns with Firefox to implement the clip behaviour of the select element in the UA-stylesheet. See: https://searchfox.org/firefox-main/rev/f19dd05bb08e26d46137ce52924e35ff7a501dfe/layout/style/res/forms.css#211 This is currently unspecified, and there is an open issue on the HTML spec here: whatwg/html#10031 Behind the flag: SelectUsesUAClip Additionally we need to specify overflow-clip-margin:content-box to maintain our previous behaviour which differs slightly from Firefox. Change-Id: Icdc61604603f5b15735958b1b95e408fb74e7b1b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7916526 Reviewed-by: David Baron <dbaron@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1644964}
If a document is controlled by a Service Worker, its own Connection- Allowlist headers will be checked in Blink before delegating the fetch to the worker. If this fetch would violate the document's allowlist, reports are now sent to the proper reporting endpoint. Bug: 514301027 Fixed: 514301027 Change-Id: I717606f6c5da4b01bfdd1ab80e5c202f9054d7c2 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7913564 Reviewed-by: Mike West <mkwst@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Shivani Sharma <shivanisha@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Andrew Verge <averge@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1644978}
In the files for this WPT, empty italics elements are used to allow artificial spacing, but were not intended to otherwise impact the layout. However, italics may impact the height by a small amount dependent on the platform implementation, causing a difference between the ref file (where both divs have <i> elements) and the primary file (where only 1 div has <i> elements). This change suppresses the italicizing style impact of these tags, reducing them to their original intent (horizontal spacing control). This in turn fixes the runs for Windows builds, where the sub-pixel rounding for this font, at this size, in italics, was rounding up (resulting in a total height of 38px), but for this font, at this size, in *not* italics, was rounding down (resulting in a total height of 37px). The Windows runs would also pass if the font size was instead slightly adjusted such that it didn't happen to hit this rounding boundary (e.g. switching to 1em), but suppressing the italics entirely is a more stable and accurate fix. Bug: 40886056 Change-Id: Iea32231eab4b70b85826623a38bb84d6d9f49b25 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7909589 Reviewed-by: Koji Ishii <kojii@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Hoch Hochkeppel <mhochk@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Alison Maher <almaher@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1645003}
If the touch action causes scrolling or panning, there is no pointerup event; a pointercancel event is fired instead. So we don't need to do additional checks. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D304738 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2043435 gecko-commit: d89a257db94c47d003d4fe82dcbd450d0d6aa644 gecko-commit-git: 0ec94e83499231b925d74c1b6eff24d43400c703 gecko-reviewers: smaug, media-playback-reviewers, alwu
Items subgridded to a parent grid-lanes subgrid did not account for the subgrid's accumulated start/end extra margins or gutter-size delta when contributing to track sizing. As a result, tracks could be undersized. This change folds the surrounding subgrid's extra margins into each subgridded item's margin sum so the contribution flows naturally through every contribution variant: - For definite-placed items, apply the subgrid's start and end extra margins at the item's known set indices, matching the analogous path in display:grid. - For auto-placed items, the placement is not yet known, so apply the largest possible per-track contribution using the existing helper that computes the largest auto-placed subgrid contribution. This change also guards two min/max content size callers so that the subgrid min/max sizes are only computed when the subgrid item's columns axis is standalone. Without this, an orthogonal subgrid whose columns axis is itself subgridded triggers a DCHECK. A number of tests had their expectations updated and some had issues in the test file that have been fixed, and all subgrid gap tests are now passing. Bug: 343257585 Change-Id: Ida1355e6a6fce96b18a8ea0c43b2c6263313c3f7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7904951 Reviewed-by: Ian Kilpatrick <ikilpatrick@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Alison Maher <almaher@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1644934}
In the crashtest, what's going on is that we try to share between two cousins that happen to be in the same tree position, one on a shadow tree and one outside. The assert fires because well, shadow data is the same (None) for both, but one matches light dom rules and another doesn't, so the revalidation fires and finds the :first-child selector for one and not the other. This doesn't cause a correctness issue on that crashtest because the length comparison fails, but it does cause correctness issues that are not caught by the assert (see the reftest). Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D305878 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2044746 gecko-commit: 2a3233eabd96abff840aa287181f5e45dffadf05 gecko-commit-git: 140f92d33fe27773374654b15f41958dbfe01c30 gecko-reviewers: firefox-style-system-reviewers, dshin
bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2044746 gecko-commit: df6fafd76c751d15e89a9fa6b32c8f6e43acea67 gecko-commit-git: a9178d81a6a06a6cd9c9cde81fe072e269d7d12b
The `ruby-overhang-spaces-vertical-003.html` test fails in the wpt.fyi Linux Docker environment due to a 1px mismatch, despite passing in the Chromium infrastructure. To resolve it, this CL updates the test to use the mplus font. This CL has been tested by using the WPT docker image. Docker Image: ghcr.io/web-platform-tests/wpt web-platform-tests dashboard: https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-ruby?q=ruby-overhang-spaces-vertical-003.html Bug: 499042741, 366873207 Change-Id: Ice3b660fc6d59c5399714409ed4c6ae00e63ece2 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7916971 Reviewed-by: Koji Ishii <kojii@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Kent Tamura <tkent@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Koji Ishii <kojii@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1645149}
This CL removes the chrome-extension:// origin test because this URL origin is not necessarily considered potentially trusthworthy. See https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-secure-contexts/#is-origin-trustworthy Note that this test was failing in https://wpt.fyi/results/webmcp/imperative/exposedTo-invalid-origins.https.html Bug: 489045948 Change-Id: I5d2eb29ae63ec60871055a66acb1d9034a7b3421 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7902304 Reviewed-by: Dominic Farolino <dom@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Fr <beaufort.francois@gmail.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1645170}
Ensure a consistent order of operations for all the new HTML insertion methods (appendHTML, prependHTML, beforeHTML, afterHTML, replaceWithHTML) - The trusted types createHTML test should always come first - ChildNode methods should then ensure the parent can accept HTML, or throw - Correctly handle <template> in all the methods (e.g. `template.appendHTML`, `template.content.beforeHTML`) - Assert some edge cases in WPT (e.g. trusted types moves nodes around) See spec PR: whatwg/html#12528 Bug: 491743369 Change-Id: I5e587ae12faad3d706e2d993bd1aa88500b3e6be Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7915261 Commit-Queue: Noam Rosenthal <nrosenthal@google.com> Reviewed-by: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1645229}
Add a CSSNumericValue.parse() test for calc() multiplication. The new test verifies that multiplication is reified as CSSMathProduct and can contain nested CSSMathSum, CSSMathMin, and CSSMathMax expressions, matching the math expression reification algorithm. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D304546 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2044316 gecko-commit: e3b733c7870fde2219a97aa8a30f7ace659f80d5 gecko-commit-git: 3a3572441ee324612748d515a778083057de4c75 gecko-reviewers: dshin
images When an SVG with `vector-effect: non-scaling-stroke` is embedded via `<image preserveAspectRatio="none">`, the stroke was incorrectly scaled because `ComputeNonScalingStrokeTransform()` only accounted for the CTM up to the SVG root. It did not include the additional scaling applied by `SVGImage::DrawInternal()` when mapping the source rect to the destination rect. This CL fixes the issue by: - Computing the container-to-destination scale in `SVGImage::DrawInternal()` and storing it on `LayoutSVGRoot` as a `container_scale_transform_`. - Including that transform in `LayoutSVGShape::ComputeNonScalingStrokeTransform()` so that non-scaling-stroke accounts for the full CTM from the shape to the host coordinate space. The fix is behind the `SvgImageNonUniformScalingFix` runtime flag. Bug: 40912001 Change-Id: I0a1041666b25eb3e285a133749fa7a253044ab47 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7320766 Reviewed-by: Virali Purbey <viralipurbey@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Fredrik Söderquist <fs@opera.com> Commit-Queue: Divyansh Mangal <dmangal@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1645331}
This fixes an edge case where we weren't aligned with the RFC and added more web platform test coverage. The RFC explicitly states that dictionaries with a matching match-dest take priority over those that are wildcard matches. Web Platform Test updates: - Improved the test cases that have unknown values in match-dest. - Improved the testing around valid and invalid characters in "id". - Tested more edge cases for dictionary match prioritization. Bug: 521299806, 40255884 Change-Id: If8f544bfd5df70f6d2ffdd8870696ff1006361d8 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7909546 Reviewed-by: Frédéric Wang Nélar <fwang@igalia.com> Reviewed-by: Tsuyoshi Horo <horo@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Patrick Meenan <pmeenan@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1645339}
This fixes the compression dictionary registration tests to properly handle the transferSize differences reported across browsers depending on if the dictionary request required revalidation or not. Change-Id: I9ea20bbe262533e67f7f4ba71b54dbf1c4a804c5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7925711 Commit-Queue: Patrick Meenan <pmeenan@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Frédéric Wang Nélar <fwang@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1645340}
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )