CC 0.7 §2.6.4: EphemeralResponse enters Tier-1 (§2.9) — Standards Action - #94
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Standards Action on the hash-pinned wire vocabulary. CIRISEdge shipped MessageType::EphemeralResponse in v18.2.0 (the typed request/response correlation that made Edge::send a working API — it had been returning Err on success) without this amendment. The cohabitation suite's wire-vocabulary drift gate caught it correctly: wheel-only, not in manifest. The placement is derived from this manifest, not chosen: - Tier 2 is structurally unavailable to it. §3.1: "CIRISEdge holds no Tier-2 kind range by design... This is intentional, not an omission." The substrate's own reply mechanism has no Private-Use code point. - The §3.3 ethical-primitive test is the EXIT test toward Tier 2, and what exits must carry a schema, canonicalization and API into a range steward's repo. This variant has none: edge never parses the payload and the canonicalization is the outer envelope's. So Tier-1 by exclusion, stated as such in §2.9 rather than implying an ethical weight it does not have. Count 25 → 26; the conformance gate (test_520_wire_vocabulary) derives its accept-set from this table, so it goes green on the hash re-pin without a hand-copied list. Interop note, for the record: a peer on an older edge refuses the variant at PARSE with an unknown-variant error enumerating the accepted set — so the pre-amendment consequence was fail-closed non-delivery of typed ephemeral replies, never a silent acceptance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FejjcCbAbRFpLkmcgCDLEY
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ratifies the wire-vocabulary row for
MessageType::EphemeralResponse, which CIRISEdge shipped in v18.2.0 without this amendment (the typed request/response correlation that madeEdge::senda working API — it had been returningErron success). CIRISConformance'stest_520_wire_vocabularydrift gate caught it correctly: wheel-only, not in manifest.The placement is derived from this manifest, not chosen:
So §2.9 states it as Tier-1 by exclusion rather than implying an ethical weight it does not have. Count 25 → 26.
Interop severity, for the record: an unratified variant is refused at parse by a conforming peer with an unknown-variant error enumerating the accepted set — so the pre-amendment consequence was fail-closed non-delivery of typed ephemeral replies against older peers, never a silent acceptance.
The conformance gate derives its accept-set from the §2 table (not a hand-copied list), so it goes green on the hash re-pin with nothing else to update.
Tracked as CIRISEdge#527.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01FejjcCbAbRFpLkmcgCDLEY