Skip to content

docs: name the outside reviews so 'no crypto audit' cannot be misread as covered - #277

Merged
emooreatx merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/audit-precision
Sep 6, 2026
Merged

docs: name the outside reviews so 'no crypto audit' cannot be misread as covered#277
emooreatx merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/audit-precision

Conversation

@emooreatx

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Docs-only. The "None to date" third-party-audit claim is unchanged.

ciris.ai/reviews lists two outside reviews — Zarncke on the alignment research agenda, Nullworks' operational-assurance review of CIRISAgent (Aug 2026). Neither is a cryptographic or attestation audit and neither covers this crate. A reader finding that page could reasonably assume otherwise, so the comparison doc now says so explicitly.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01U4djyL5Vx6whagKB7J4586

… as covered

ciris.ai/reviews lists two outside reviews (Zarncke on the alignment agenda,
Nullworks on CIRISAgent operationally). Neither is a cryptographic or
attestation audit and neither covers this crate. The "None to date" claim is
unchanged; this makes it harder to misread.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01U4djyL5Vx6whagKB7J4586
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@emooreatx
emooreatx merged commit 9fee79d into main Sep 6, 2026
27 checks passed
@emooreatx
emooreatx deleted the docs/audit-precision branch September 6, 2026 17:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant