feat(results): add the climate_ref.results read layer by lewisjared · Pull Request #780 · Climate-REF/climate-ref

91.42% (+0.21%) compared to aab1270

91.42% (+0.21%) compared to aab1270

❌ Patch coverage is 94.41341% with 60 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ages/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/results/_query.py	82.29%	10 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
...ages/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/cli/executions.py	85.71%	9 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
...es/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/results/outliers.py	87.95%	5 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
...ages/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/results/values.py	95.85%	6 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...ages/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/results/frames.py	90.69%	2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...kages/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/datasets/base.py	90.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...es/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/results/datasets.py	97.87%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...climate-ref/src/climate_ref/results/diagnostics.py	97.64%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ckages/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/cli/__init__.py	`92.24% <100.00%> (+0.06%)`	⬆️
...ckages/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/cli/datasets.py	`88.34% <100.00%> (+0.72%)`	⬆️
...ges/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/cli/diagnostics.py	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
...ages/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/datasets/utils.py	`92.24% <100.00%> (+0.44%)`	⬆️
...te-ref/src/climate_ref/executor/result_handling.py	`96.00% <100.00%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
...ages/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/models/dataset.py	`98.10% <100.00%> (+0.08%)`	⬆️
...limate-ref/src/climate_ref/models/dataset_query.py	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
...es/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/models/execution.py	`98.72% <100.00%> (ø)`
...climate-ref/src/climate_ref/models/metric_value.py	`92.72% <100.00%> (-1.03%)`	⬇️
...es/climate-ref/src/climate_ref/results/__init__.py	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
... and 13 more

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.