Skip to content

Fix inconsistency with add operator, Added switch/case, Added default pipeline, Filter block with format function#95

Closed
maximee-leroyy wants to merge 0 commit into
CloudyKit:masterfrom
maximee-leroyy:master
Closed

Fix inconsistency with add operator, Added switch/case, Added default pipeline, Filter block with format function#95
maximee-leroyy wants to merge 0 commit into
CloudyKit:masterfrom
maximee-leroyy:master

Conversation

@maximee-leroyy

@maximee-leroyy maximee-leroyy commented Jul 17, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

#93

@annismckenzie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I rebased all of your work on top of the current master and reworked the commits some (dropping unnecessary merges, combining fixup commits). I went through the code yesterday and understand only half of it so I'll add some tests next. I might also split out the + operator changes as I mentioned in #93.

@annismckenzie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sorry that this takes so long but I'm not comfortable with merging this before I add at least a couple more test cases. I will do that this week.

@annismckenzie annismckenzie self-assigned this Aug 9, 2018
@ylacancellera

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi !
Any plan on this ? Looking forward for it !

@tooolbox

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@annismckenzie ping! :)

@Dexus

Dexus commented Jan 30, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ping @annismckenzie <3

@annismckenzie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tooolbox @Dexus I can do a rebase of this branch against the current master but then it'd be up to someone else to test this as I currently don't have the bandwidth to make sure this monster of a PR is good to go. The project where I used Jet extensively was replaced just a couple days ago after working on a single page application for the last 2 years… so I'm effectively not using Jet anymore in production. Any thoughts?

@annismckenzie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sigh, made a mistake with a push. Don't really know what happened here on the upstream. I rebased everything and will open up a new PR. Sorry guys.

@tooolbox

tooolbox commented Feb 2, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No prob @annismckenzie

Sure, don't mind doing some testing.

@annismckenzie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

That's greatly appreciated! I'll try to write up some more tests for the parts that don't have any yet (default etc.). The branch in #136 is rebased against the current master with Go modules on v3. Can you take that for a spin?

@Dexus

Dexus commented Feb 2, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@annismckenzie will take it for a test in our dev.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants