v5.122.1 proposal

[dd-octo-sts]

No description provided.

[dd-octo-sts]

Overall package size

Self size: 8.2 MB
Deduped: 8.87 MB
No deduping: 8.87 MB

Dependency sizes

| name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | import-in-the-middle | 3.3.3 | 125.43 kB | 445.14 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.11 | 25.74 kB | 25.74 kB |

_{🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe}

[datadog-datadog-us1-prod]

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🔄 Datadog retried 1 test - 1 passed on retry

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 98.47%

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 03d15ea | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-18 05:24:15

Comparing candidate commit 03d15ea in PR branch v5.122.1-proposal with baseline commit 05b458e in branch v5.x.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 2285 metrics, 7 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

• 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
• 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:appsec-iast-with-vulnerability-iast-enabled-default-config-20

• unstable max_rss_usage [-16.464MB; +25.435MB] or [-4.368%; +6.748%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-24

• unstable max_rss_usage [-11.588MB; +15.065MB] or [-4.739%; +6.161%]

scenario:dogstatsd-with-tags-20

• unstable cpu_user_time [-116.246ms; +532.926ms] or [-2.319%; +10.630%]
• unstable execution_time [-121.789ms; +534.048ms] or [-2.396%; +10.507%]
• unstable throughput [-184960.018op/s; +41623.728op/s] or [-11.176%; +2.515%]

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-and-collapse-off-20

• unstable max_rss_usage [-17.604MB; +31.645MB] or [-4.553%; +8.185%]

scenario:test-optimization-large-suite-20

• unstable max_rss_usage [-5414.530KB; +5448.530KB] or [-6.768%; +6.811%]

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.47%. Comparing base (6b35e7d) to head (03d15ea).
⚠️ Report is 2142 commits behind head on v5.x.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             v5.x    #9844       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   83.19%   98.47%   +15.27%     
===========================================
  Files         476      978      +502     
  Lines       20153   144181   +124028     
  Branches        0    12669    +12669     
===========================================
+ Hits        16766   141977   +125211     
+ Misses       3387     2204     -1183     

Flag	Coverage Δ
aiguard	57.40% <ø> (?)
aiguard-integration	55.31% <ø> (?)
apm-bucket-0	57.50% <ø> (?)
apm-bucket-1	62.70% <ø> (?)
apm-bucket-2	61.53% <ø> (?)
apm-bucket-3	59.16% <ø> (?)
apm-capabilities-tracing	62.35% <ø> (?)
apm-integrations-aerospike	55.39% <ø> (?)
apm-integrations-confluentinc-kafka-javascript	60.51% <ø> (?)
apm-integrations-couchbase	56.09% <ø> (?)
apm-integrations-http	61.27% <ø> (?)
apm-integrations-kafkajs	61.03% <ø> (?)
apm-integrations-next	58.77% <ø> (?)
apm-integrations-prisma	58.22% <ø> (?)
appsec	71.41% <ø> (?)
appsec-express_fastify_graphql	68.82% <ø> (?)
appsec-integration	49.58% <ø> (?)
appsec-kafka_ldapjs_lodash	62.78% <ø> (?)
appsec-mongodb-core_mongoose_mysql	66.27% <ø> (?)
appsec-next	56.15% <ø> (?)
appsec-node-serialize_passport_postgres	65.68% <ø> (?)
appsec-sourcing_stripe_template	64.11% <ø> (?)
debugger	63.56% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-0	51.12% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-1	59.01% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-10	60.28% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-11	60.94% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-12	51.03% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-13	51.88% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-14	51.13% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-2	52.37% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-3	53.01% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-4	58.10% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-5	48.71% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-6	59.62% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-7	51.32% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-8	57.81% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-bucket-9	56.66% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-instrumentation-couchbase	50.09% <ø> (?)
instrumentations-integration-esbuild	33.92% <ø> (?)
llmobs-ai_anthropic_bedrock	62.20% <ø> (?)
llmobs-bucket-1	60.73% <ø> (?)
llmobs-openai	61.41% <ø> (?)
llmobs-openai-agents_vertex-ai	59.45% <ø> (?)
llmobs-sdk	67.11% <ø> (?)
openfeature	55.00% <ø> (?)
openfeature-unit	52.72% <ø> (?)
platform-core_esbuild_instrumentations-misc	40.85% <ø> (?)
platform-integration	59.76% <ø> (?)
platform-shimmer_unit-guardrails_webpack	38.33% <ø> (?)
plugins-browser-bunyan_bullmq_cassandra	60.90% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-0	56.32% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-1	53.38% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-11	61.28% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-18	60.84% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-19	59.07% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-20	61.00% <ø> (?)
plugins-bucket-4	55.70% <ø> (?)
plugins-cookie_cookie-parser_crypto	50.65% <ø> (?)
plugins-fastify_fetch_fs	59.95% <ø> (?)
plugins-generic-pool_google-cloud-pubsub_grpc	63.47% <ø> (?)
plugins-handlebars_hapi_hono	57.93% <ø> (?)
plugins-ioredis_knex_langgraph	56.39% <ø> (?)
plugins-ldapjs_light-my-request_limitd-client	57.64% <ø> (?)
plugins-lodash_mariadb_memcached	57.33% <ø> (?)
plugins-moleculer_mongodb_mongodb-core	60.78% <ø> (?)
plugins-mongoose_multer_mysql	58.62% <ø> (?)
plugins-mysql2_nats_node-serialize	60.24% <ø> (?)
plugins-opensearch_passport-http_pino	58.49% <ø> (?)
plugins-postgres_process_pug	57.64% <ø> (?)
plugins-redis_router_sequelize	60.85% <ø> (?)
plugins-test-and-upstream-rhea_undici_url	60.44% <ø> (?)
plugins-valkey_vm_winston	57.06% <ø> (?)
plugins-ws	58.62% <ø> (?)
profiling	61.05% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-aws-sdk	54.30% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-base-inject-field	50.35% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-bedrockruntime	54.08% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-client	55.59% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-dynamodb	54.90% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-eventbridge	56.39% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-kinesis	58.43% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-lambda	56.61% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-s3	55.00% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-serverless-peer-service	59.01% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-sns	59.23% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-sqs	59.64% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-stepfunctions	54.83% <ø> (?)
serverless-aws-sdk-util	50.87% <ø> (?)
serverless-bucket-0	53.14% <ø> (?)
serverless-bucket-1	58.24% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-cucumber	70.60% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-cypress	64.40% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-jest	71.78% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-mocha	72.02% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-atr	59.37% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-efd	59.48% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-final-status	59.64% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-impacted-tests	59.19% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-reporting	60.80% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-management	60.28% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-span	59.35% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-selenium	58.76% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-testopt	57.40% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-vitest	72.79% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-vitest-browser	58.63% <ø> (?)
test-optimization-webdriverio	64.82% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[dd-octo-sts]

Superseded by #9861.