Skip to content

fix(rc)!: fix missing/null deserialization and rename tracing_sample_rate#2102

Open
iunanua wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
igor/rc/fix-dynamic-config-des
Open

fix(rc)!: fix missing/null deserialization and rename tracing_sample_rate#2102
iunanua wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
igor/rc/fix-dynamic-config-des

Conversation

@iunanua

@iunanua iunanua commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What does this PR do?

  • Rename tracing_sample_rate as tracing_sampling_rate
  • Wraps every DynamicConfig field in a new Patch<T> newtype that encodes
    JSON Merge Patch (RFC 7396) semantics:
    • Patch(None) — field absent on the wire (no change intended)
    • Patch(Some(None)) — field present as JSON null (clear prior override)
    • Patch(Some(Some(v))) — field present with value (set to v)

Configs variants now carry Option<T> (Some = set, None = clear), and
From<DynamicConfig> for Vec<Configs> only emits a variant for fields
that were actually delivered. This fixes the prior collapse where any
APM_TRACING payload missing tracing_sampling_rate looked the same to
consumers as tracing_sampling_rate: null, so a payload that updated
unrelated fields (e.g. tracing_tags) would wipe an active remote
sample-rate override.

Notes

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tests

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
Patch Coverage: 92.16%
Overall Coverage: 73.43% (+0.05%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 74dc659 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 3170 documentation warning(s) found

📦 datadog-sidecar - 2655 warning(s)

📦 libdd-remote-config - 515 warning(s)


Updated: 2026-06-11 10:36:12 UTC | Commit: 47d8619 | missing-docs job results

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Comparing clippy allow annotations between branches:

  • Base Branch: origin/main
  • PR Branch: origin/igor/rc/fix-dynamic-config-des

Summary by Rule

Rule Base Branch PR Branch Change
expect_used 2 2 No change (0%)
unwrap_used 6 6 No change (0%)
Total 8 8 No change (0%)

Annotation Counts by File

File Base Branch PR Branch Change
datadog-sidecar/src/shm_remote_config.rs 8 8 No change (0%)

Annotation Stats by Crate

Crate Base Branch PR Branch Change
clippy-annotation-reporter 5 5 No change (0%)
datadog-ffe-ffi 1 1 No change (0%)
datadog-ipc 21 21 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-live-debugger-ffi 10 10 No change (0%)
datadog-profiling-replayer 4 4 No change (0%)
datadog-sidecar 46 46 No change (0%)
libdd-common 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-common-ffi 12 12 No change (0%)
libdd-data-pipeline 5 5 No change (0%)
libdd-ddsketch 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-dogstatsd-client 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-profiling 13 13 No change (0%)
libdd-remote-config 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-telemetry 20 20 No change (0%)
libdd-tinybytes 4 4 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-normalization 2 2 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-obfuscation 3 3 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-stats 1 1 No change (0%)
libdd-trace-utils 11 11 No change (0%)
Total 181 181 No change (0%)

About This Report

This report tracks Clippy allow annotations for specific rules, showing how they've changed in this PR. Decreasing the number of these annotations generally improves code quality.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 11 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 datadog-sidecar - 6 error(s)

Show output
error[unmaintained]: Bincode is unmaintained
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:37:1
   │
37 │ bincode 1.3.3 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unmaintained advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0141
   ├ Due to a doxxing and harassment incident, the bincode team has taken the decision to cease development permanently.
     
     The team considers version 1.3.3 a complete version of bincode that is not in need of any updates.
     
     ## Alternatives to consider
     
     * [wincode](https://crates.io/crates/wincode)
     * [postcard](https://crates.io/crates/postcard)
     * [bitcode](https://crates.io/crates/bitcode)
     * [rkyv](https://crates.io/crates/rkyv)
   ├ Announcement: https://git.sr.ht/~stygianentity/bincode/tree/v3.0/item/README.md
   ├ Solution: No safe upgrade is available!
   ├ bincode v1.3.3
     ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
     │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
     └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:298:1
    │
298 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      ├── libdd-common v4.2.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
      │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0
      │   │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
      │   │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
      │   │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-common-ffi v35.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-remote-config v0.1.0
      │   │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
      │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v0.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1
              ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
              ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.1 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:326:1
    │
326 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v35.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-remote-config v0.1.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:326:1
    │
326 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v35.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-remote-config v0.1.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:326:1
    │
326 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
          │       ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
          │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
          │       │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v2.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1
          │       │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   ├── libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0
          │       │   │   │   │       └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-ipc v0.1.0 (*)
          │       │   │       ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0
          │       │       ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-common-ffi v35.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── (build) libdd-crashtracker v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-crashtracker-ffi v35.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v3.0.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-remote-config v0.1.0
          │       │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0 (*)
          │       │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
          │       │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v1.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v4.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v5.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v8.0.0 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:385:1
    │
385 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      ├── libdd-remote-config v0.1.0
      │   ├── datadog-ffe v1.0.0
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1
      │   ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1
      │   │   └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── (dev) datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)
      │   └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v0.1.0 (*)
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v6.0.0
                  ├── datadog-live-debugger v0.0.1 (*)
                  └── datadog-sidecar v0.0.1 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

📦 libdd-remote-config - 5 error(s)

Show output
error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:86:1
   │
86 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
   ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
     
     - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
     - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
     - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
     - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
     - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
     
     `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
   ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
   ├ rand v0.8.5
     └── (dev) libdd-common v4.2.0
         └── libdd-remote-config v0.1.0
             └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v0.1.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:97:1
   │
97 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
   ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
     
     Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
     
     Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
     
     This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     └── rustls v0.23.37
         ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
         │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
         │       └── libdd-remote-config v0.1.0
         │           └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v0.1.0 (*)
         ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
         └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
             ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
             └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:97:1
   │
97 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
   ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
     
     This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
     This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
     
     Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
     
     This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     └── rustls v0.23.37
         ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
         │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
         │       └── libdd-remote-config v0.1.0
         │           └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v0.1.0 (*)
         ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
         └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
             ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
             └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
   ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:97:1
   │
97 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
   │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
   │
   ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
   ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
   ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
     or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
     `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
     
     This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
     
     Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
     
     Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
   ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
   ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
     └── rustls v0.23.37
         ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
         │   └── libdd-common v4.2.0
         │       └── libdd-remote-config v0.1.0
         │           └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v0.1.0 (*)
         ├── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)
         └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
             ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
             └── libdd-common v4.2.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:124:1
    │
124 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── libdd-remote-config v0.1.0
          └── (dev) libdd-remote-config v0.1.0 (*)

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-06-11 10:37:17 UTC | Commit: 47d8619 | dependency-check job results

@iunanua iunanua changed the title fix(remote_config): rename DynamicConfig::tracing_sample_rate fix(remote_config): rename DynamicConfig::tracing_sample_rate Jun 10, 2026
@iunanua iunanua changed the title fix(remote_config): rename DynamicConfig::tracing_sample_rate fix(remote_config)!: rename DynamicConfig::tracing_sample_rate Jun 10, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 83.68 MB 83.68 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 7.70 MB 7.70 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 94.79 MB 94.79 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.35 MB 10.35 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
libdatadog-x64-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 24.82 MB 24.82 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 86.89 KB 86.89 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 180.82 MB 180.91 MB +.05% (+96.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 925.68 MB 926.05 MB +.03% (+378.15 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 8.09 MB 8.09 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 86.89 KB 86.89 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 23.93 MB 23.93 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 47.78 MB 47.78 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
libdatadog-x86-windows
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 21.53 MB 21.53 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 88.26 KB 88.26 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 184.91 MB 185.01 MB +.05% (+104.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 918.55 MB 918.92 MB +.03% (+373.33 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll 6.24 MB 6.24 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 88.26 KB 88.26 KB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb 25.66 MB 25.66 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib 45.41 MB 45.41 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
x86_64-alpine-linux-musl
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 74.61 MB 74.61 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 8.58 MB 8.58 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Artifact Baseline Commit Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a 90.02 MB 90.02 MB 0% (0 B) 👌
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so 10.44 MB 10.44 MB 0% (0 B) 👌

@iunanua iunanua force-pushed the igor/rc/fix-dynamic-config-des branch from 82ba0f6 to c0bb7a8 Compare June 10, 2026 14:53
Wraps every DynamicConfig field in a new `Patch<T>` newtype that encodes
JSON Merge Patch (RFC 7396) semantics:
  - Patch(None)          — field absent on the wire (no change intended)
  - Patch(Some(None))    — field present as JSON null (clear prior override)
  - Patch(Some(Some(v))) — field present with value (set to v)

`Configs` variants now carry `Option<T>` (Some = set, None = clear), and
`From<DynamicConfig> for Vec<Configs>` only emits a variant for fields
that were actually delivered. This fixes the prior collapse where any
APM_TRACING payload missing tracing_sampling_rate looked the same to
consumers as `tracing_sampling_rate: null`, so a payload that updated
unrelated fields (e.g. tracing_tags) would wipe an active remote
sample-rate override.

The struct-level `#[serde(default)]` keeps the new shape free of
per-field `deserialize_with` boilerplate. Test-feature `Serialize` is a
small hand-written impl that skips absent fields to keep the
`dummy_dynamic_config` round-trip intact for the sidecar tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@iunanua iunanua force-pushed the igor/rc/fix-dynamic-config-des branch from c0bb7a8 to 1e238b0 Compare June 10, 2026 14:58
@iunanua iunanua changed the title fix(remote_config)!: rename DynamicConfig::tracing_sample_rate fix(rc)!: fix missing/null deserialization and rename tracing_sample_rate Jun 10, 2026
iunanua and others added 2 commits June 11, 2026 09:34
Named constructors (`Patch::absent`/`clear`/`set`) make construction
sites self-documenting. The `tracing_sample_rate` alias keeps payloads
from legacy producers from being silently dropped as absent after the
field rename.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@iunanua iunanua marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2026 10:06
@iunanua iunanua requested review from a team as code owners June 11, 2026 10:06

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1f97593726

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

for config in configs {
if let Configs::DynamicInstrumentationEnabled(enabled) = config {
writer.dynamic_instrumentation = Some(enabled);
writer.dynamic_instrumentation = enabled;

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve dynamic instrumentation when the field is absent

When an APM_TRACING update omits dynamic_instrumentation_enabled (for example it only changes tracing_tags), Vec<Configs> now correctly emits no DynamicInstrumentationEnabled variant, but writer.dynamic_instrumentation was already cleared by the take() above this loop. Since this assignment only runs for delivered variants, the previous remote override is lost and the sidecar can unforce LiveDebugger even though the new patch did not clear the field; keep the old value unless an explicit Some(...)/None patch is present.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

umm, It seems a problem not related with the changes introduced by this PR. I'm going to change it.
wdyt @bwoebi?

@bantonsson bantonsson left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice

…ING patches

The shm_remote_config fetched() handler was clearing
writer.dynamic_instrumentation up front and rebuilding it only from
delivered Configs variants. With JSON Merge Patch semantics, a payload
that updates an unrelated field (e.g. tracing_tags) omits
dynamic_instrumentation_enabled to mean "no change" — but the take()
collapsed that into "clear", triggering a spurious LiveDebugger
unforce/force cycle.

Keep the prior value and only mutate when a DynamicInstrumentationEnabled
variant is actually delivered. Some(_) sets, explicit None (now
distinguishable thanks to Patch<T>) clears, absent leaves the value alone.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Comment on lines +159 to +166
pub(crate) tracing_sampling_rate: Patch<f64>,
pub(crate) log_injection_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) tracing_tags: Patch<Vec<String>>,
pub(crate) tracing_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) tracing_sampling_rules: Patch<Vec<TracingSamplingRule>>,
pub(crate) dynamic_instrumentation_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) exception_replay_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) code_origin_enabled: Patch<bool>,

@iunanua iunanua Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm tempted of making them public in order to make it easier to access (and that it isn't necessary to create and iterate over a Vec<Configs> array).

Suggested change
pub(crate) tracing_sampling_rate: Patch<f64>,
pub(crate) log_injection_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) tracing_tags: Patch<Vec<String>>,
pub(crate) tracing_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) tracing_sampling_rules: Patch<Vec<TracingSamplingRule>>,
pub(crate) dynamic_instrumentation_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) exception_replay_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) code_origin_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub tracing_sampling_rate: Patch<f64>,
pub log_injection_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub tracing_tags: Patch<Vec<String>>,
pub tracing_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub tracing_sampling_rules: Patch<Vec<TracingSamplingRule>>,
pub dynamic_instrumentation_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub exception_replay_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub code_origin_enabled: Patch<bool>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be clearer to re-export them at the module level if that's possible?

Comment on lines +159 to +166
pub(crate) tracing_sampling_rate: Patch<f64>,
pub(crate) log_injection_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) tracing_tags: Patch<Vec<String>>,
pub(crate) tracing_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) tracing_sampling_rules: Patch<Vec<TracingSamplingRule>>,
pub(crate) dynamic_instrumentation_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) exception_replay_enabled: Patch<bool>,
pub(crate) code_origin_enabled: Patch<bool>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be clearer to re-export them at the module level if that's possible?

Comment on lines +185 to +193
field!(s, tracing_header_tags);
field!(s, tracing_sampling_rate);
field!(s, log_injection_enabled);
field!(s, tracing_tags);
field!(s, tracing_enabled);
field!(s, tracing_sampling_rules);
field!(s, dynamic_instrumentation_enabled);
field!(s, exception_replay_enabled);
field!(s, code_origin_enabled);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be useful to emit these in a canonical order, e.g. alphabetically sorted by tag?


impl From<DynamicConfig> for Vec<Configs> {
fn from(value: DynamicConfig) -> Self {
let mut vec = vec![];

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would it make sense to with_capacity here to reserve space and avoid resizes?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants