Write the three sites in the first person instead of naming a role

docs/promotion.md

@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ names which corners those were while the reason is still remembered.
 ## What promotion does not create
 
 It is not a promise of support from this board. Nothing here is maintained
-against anybody else's use of it, and an experiment does not gain a maintainer
-by being taken somewhere.
+against anybody else's use of it, and an experiment does not gain anybody who
+will keep it working by being taken somewhere.
 
 It is not a claim that the code is finished. The line above about what would
 have to change is the measure of that, and it is part of the hand-over rather

docs/quality-parity.md

@@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ below is the one that was absent either way.
 | Parameter | Here | Target | Verdict |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | `allowed_merge_methods` | `["merge","squash","rebase"]` | `["merge"]` | Change owed. This is the one deviation in this walk worth closing rather than reasoning away, and the reason is below. |
-| `required_approving_review_count` | `0` | `0` | Kept. A count above zero on a board with one maintainer refuses every merge, and a rule nobody can satisfy is switched off in a hurry rather than met. |
+| `required_approving_review_count` | `0` | `0` | Kept. A count above zero on a board where I am the only reviewer refuses every merge, and a rule nobody can satisfy is switched off in a hurry rather than met. |
 | `dismiss_stale_reviews_on_push` | `false` | `false` | Kept. It only bites where a review is required, and none is required at a count of zero. |
 | `require_last_push_approval` | `false` | `false` | Kept, for the reason in the row above. |
 | `required_review_thread_resolution` | `false` | `false` | Kept, for the reason two rows above. |

internal/invariants/invariants.go

@@ -71,9 +71,9 @@ const (
 )
 
 // DeclaredLicence is the licence this repository has decided on. Record 0018
-// answers entry one of the maintainer question issue with GPL-3.0, one licence
-// for the runner and the experiment content alike, and issue #47 is the change
-// that lands the file and sets this string.
+// answers entry one of issue #46 with GPL-3.0, one licence for the runner and
+// the experiment content alike, and issue #47 is the change that lands the file
+// and sets this string.
 //
 // IT IS SPELLED AS THE TITLE LINE RATHER THAN AS THE SPDX IDENTIFIER, and that
 // is forced by what the leg below asks. The leg asks whether the licence file
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ func licenceLeg(root, declaredLicence string) (Leg, []Refusal) {
 		return Leg{
 			Name: "the licence",
 			NotAsked: fmt.Sprintf("no licence is declared, so there is nothing to compare %s against. "+
-				"asking costs answering entry one of the maintainer question issue and landing the file, "+
+				"asking costs answering entry one of issue #46 and landing the file, "+
 				"the repository metadata and the decision record that names it, which is issue #47", LicenceName),
 		}, nil
 	}