[1.0.0] Make the bench comparison more generic / test fixes.#230
Merged
ChadSikorra merged 3 commits intoJul 21, 2026
Conversation
… Add OpenDJ as a potential comparison.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #230 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 88.74% 88.74%
Complexity 6073 6073
=========================================
Files 518 518
Lines 21711 21711
=========================================
Hits 19268 19268
Misses 2443 2443 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
… the occasional flakes and speeds things up.
ChadSikorra
force-pushed
the
upgrade/load-testing-changes
branch
from
July 21, 2026 23:18
0f2eb2f to
9dee5f4
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes the bench comparison generic so you can use a source and target. I mostly wanted to see how the performance here compares to other LDAP implementations to see what could still use some attention / where things stand. Currently it only lets you run OpenDJ / OpenLDAP / FreeDSx.
PHP can't compete with the speed of C + LMDB on sub search / list search, but other ops are basically comparable. We do outpace the speed / throughput of OpenDJ (surprisingly). That's with their default storage though. I didn't try other ones. I may investigate how to configure it with jdbc / something else.