Preserve native Claude orchestration boundaries - #3
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
GPTCODE_ACTIVE=1marker that downstream launchers can use to prevent provider-state leakageRoot cause
gptCode had accumulated behavioral Workflow guidance in its provider preamble, and a Tessera process launched from a gptCode session could inherit the isolated provider environment before starting what looked like regular Claude Code.
Impact
gptCode returns to the native-first product boundary: GPT supplies reasoning through Codex OAuth, while Claude Code remains the unmodified orchestration shell. The marker is inert and changes no prompt, model, tool, workflow, auth, or retry behavior by itself.
Validation
npm run check— 101/101 tests, package verification, and install smoke pass