Fix: incorrect integer extension for Unsigned in pointerref and pointerset. - #583
Draft
jack-dunham wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Fix: incorrect integer extension for Unsigned in pointerref and pointerset.#583jack-dunham wants to merge 1 commit into
Unsigned in pointerref and pointerset.#583jack-dunham wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
LLVM seems to assume signed integers by default in its
getelementptrinstruction which (I assume) means Julia employssextwhen generating the LLVM IR. However, if the index is anUnsignedthat is smaller than the index width of the target, this gets interpreted asSignedand incorrectly extended usingsextinstead ofzext. This can lead to incorrect memory accesses or segmentation faults. See:which outputs:
The
UInt32gets interpreted as ai32and then extended toi64viasext. This gives a wrong address whenever the index is betweentypemax(Int32)andtypemax(UInt32).This PR promotes any index to Int64 which alters the LLVM IR for
Unsignedto first usezextbefore computing the address:The LLVM IR generated for
Signedis identical and for index widths of 32bits I believe LLVM should optimize the extension followed by truncation to a no-op.Tests to follow so leaving this as a draft, but this should fix JuliaGPU/CUDA.jl#3220.