New to this work? Start here: https://github.com/LalaSkye/start-here
This repository is a public inspection surface, not full architecture disclosure.
It shows a bounded claim, a runnable evidence object, an inspection path, and the claim limit.
See PUBLIC_DISCLOSURE_BOUNDARY.md.
Commit Gate Core is a small public proof surface for one execution-boundary claim.
It demonstrates a path-local control condition:
No state mutation on the demonstrated path without a valid, scoped, unexpired, unreplayed
DecisionRecord.
If the required condition fails, the demonstrated action does not run.
This repository demonstrates one bounded path-local commit-gate behaviour.
It does not claim:
- production readiness
- enterprise deployment
- compliance or certification
- path-universal governance
- payload binding across all systems
- atomic commit across all routes
- non-bypassability outside the demonstrated path
git clone https://github.com/LalaSkye/commit-gate-core.git
cd commit-gate-core
python -m examples.unsafe_email_sendExpected output:
Result: HOLD
Email sent: false
Receipt written: true
Run the demo and adversarial invariant verifier:
python -m examples.unsafe_email_send
python scripts/verify_adversarial_invariants.pyThe narrow question this repo answers is:
Can the demonstrated action reach consequence without a valid DecisionRecord?
Expected answer:
No.
On the demonstrated path:
- unsafe consequence can be refused before execution
- missing authority prevents mutation
- failed checks produce HOLD / DENY behaviour
- refusal can produce an auditable receipt when the audit sink accepts the event
- bypass failure can be tested directly
This repository does not prove adoption, certification, standardisation, production readiness, compliance, or path-universal deployment coverage.
It does not prove the wider governance architecture.
It proves only the bounded claim attached to this public proof object.
For the demonstrated scenario:
Execution occurred: false
Receipt written: true
Verdict: HOLD
Claim discipline for this repo is controlled in:
docs/governance/ADMISSIBLE_CLAIM_REGISTER_v1.md
Working paper:
From Policy to Commit: Execution-Boundary Control for Governed AI Systems
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19980275
- Zenodo record: https://zenodo.org/records/19980275
v0.1 — bounded public proof surface.
Small surface. Clear failure mode. Receipts over reassurance.
MIT.