Skip to content

Cherry-picking commits from main to release/8.0.0 for PR #32004#32097

Open
runway-github[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
release/8.0.0from
runway-cherry-pick-8.0.0-1781882394
Open

Cherry-picking commits from main to release/8.0.0 for PR #32004#32097
runway-github[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
release/8.0.0from
runway-cherry-pick-8.0.0-1781882394

Conversation

@runway-github

@runway-github runway-github Bot commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This PR updates the money activity list to show musdback transactions.
It assumes a particular type for the transactions, which has not been
confirmed by the accounts team yet. In the interest of speed, we plan to
merge this and then make a cherry pick PR if the type needs to be
changed.

Changelog

CHANGELOG entry: show cashback transactions in money activity

Related issues

Fixes: musd-1021

Manual testing steps

Feature: money activity
  Scenario: user has cashback transactions that land in their money account
    Given user has cashback transactions that land in their money account

    When user looks at the money activity
    Then they see the transactions

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

n/a

After

Screenshot 2026-06-19 at 11 04 54

Screenshot 2026-06-19 at 11 05 04

Screenshot 2026-06-19 at 11 05 28

Pre-merge author checklist

Performance checks (if applicable)

  • I've tested on Android
    • Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
  • I've tested with a power user scenario
  • Use these power-user
    SRPs

    to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
  • I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
    performance metrics
  • See trace() for usage and
    addToken
    for an example

For performance guidelines and tooling, see the Performance
Guide
.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
    app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
    in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
    as recordings and or screenshots.

Note

Medium Risk
Touches money activity merging, API transaction-type assumptions
(METAMASK_CARD_CASHBACK), and navigation for activity details; wrong
parsing or bucketing could mislabel deposits vs transfers, though
changes are well tested.

Overview
Money activity now treats Accounts API data as card spends and
cashback (mUSD back)
instead of card-only rows. Parsing accepts
METAMASK_CARD_CASHBACK, types use AccountsApiActivity with kind: 'card' | 'cashback', and list rows go through
AccountsApiActivityItem with shared display helpers.

Filtering and merging move into useMoneyActivityItems: home
and full activity views share the same buckets (cashback in
Deposits, card spends in Transfers), mock QA data includes a
sample cashback row, and merge logic dedupes by hash with stable sort
tie-breaks.

Details UX replaces the card bottom sheet and confirmations
CardTransactionDetails with MoneyApiActivityDetailsView on
the existing card-details route (activity param). Copy branches for
spend vs earned amounts and counterparty rows; the modal sheet route is
removed.

Tests and copy follow the rename (useMoneyAccountApiActivity,
parseAccountsApiActivity) and add coverage for cashback filtering and
the new details screen.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit
6e5b192. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
here.

[c7b940c](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/commit/c7b940caf318f78329305936e33aba2525e7ab2d)

…0.0 (#32004)

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.

Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until this PR meets the canonical
Definition of Ready For Review in `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.

In short: the template must be materially complete (not just section
titles
present), all status checks must be currently passing, and the only
expected
follow-up commits must be reviewer-driven.
-->
<!--
mms-check directive vocabulary — read by
.github/scripts/shared/pr-template-checks.ts
at module load to build the validation plan. Directives are invisible in
rendered
markdown and must NOT be removed or edited without updating the
validator registry.

  type=text           Section must contain non-placeholder prose.
  type=changelog      Section must have a valid CHANGELOG entry: line.
type=issue-link Section must have a Fixes:/Closes:/Refs: line with a
value.
type=manual-testing Section must have real testing steps or an explicit
N/A.
type=screenshot Section must have evidence (image/URL) or an explicit
N/A.
type=checklist Section must have all checkboxes consciously checked.
required=true|false Whether a missing/invalid section runs the validator
at all.
blocking=true|false Whether a failure of this check fails the CI
workflow.
Default: false — failures are shown as warnings in the sticky
                      comment but do not block the PR.

Sections without a directive are checked for structural presence only.
-->

## **Description**
This PR updates the money activity list to show musdback transactions.
It assumes a particular type for the transactions, which has not been
confirmed by the accounts team yet. In the interest of speed, we plan to
merge this and then make a cherry pick PR if the type needs to be
changed.

<!-- mms-check: type=text required=true -->

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Changelog**

<!-- mms-check: type=changelog required=true blocking=true -->

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry: show cashback transactions in money activity

## **Related issues**

<!-- mms-check: type=issue-link required=true -->

Fixes: musd-1021

## **Manual testing steps**

<!-- mms-check: type=manual-testing required=true -->

```gherkin
Feature: money activity
  Scenario: user has cashback transactions that land in their money account
    Given user has cashback transactions that land in their money account

    When user looks at the money activity
    Then they see the transactions
```

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- mms-check: type=screenshot required=true -->

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**
n/a
<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**
<img width="404" height="383" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-19 at 11 04 54"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e8009365-4a42-4fc1-9f6f-a19ff64bc764"
/>

<img width="419" height="858" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-19 at 11 05 04"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/12e5b89d-0884-4297-99bd-3307236f2804"
/>

<img width="418" height="853" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-19 at 11 05 28"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e027171f-cf8b-4f34-ab23-bc6c3d8d404f"
/>

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

<!-- mms-check: type=checklist required=true -->

<!--
Every checklist item must be consciously assessed before marking this PR
as
"Ready for review". A checked box means you deliberately considered that
responsibility, not that you literally performed every action listed.

Unchecked boxes are ambiguous: they are not an implicit "N/A" and they
are not
a silent "skip". See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md` for the full
checklist
semantics.
-->

- [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I've included tests if applicable
- [x] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [x] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

#### Performance checks (if applicable)

- [x] I've tested on Android
  - Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
- [x] I've tested with a power user scenario
- Use these [power-user
SRPs](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/edit-v2/401401446401?draftShareId=9d77e1e1-4bdc-4be1-9ebb-ccd916988d93)
to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
- [x] I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
performance metrics
- See [`trace()`](/app/util/trace.ts) for usage and
[`addToken`](/app/components/Views/AddAsset/components/AddCustomToken/AddCustomToken.tsx#L274)
for an example

For performance guidelines and tooling, see the [Performance
Guide](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/400085549067/Performance+Guide+for+Engineers).

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

<!--
Reviewer checklist items follow the same semantics as the author
checklist: an
unchecked box is ambiguous, a checked box means the reviewer consciously
assessed that responsibility. See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
-->

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.



<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---

> [!NOTE]
> **Medium Risk**
> Touches money activity merging, API transaction-type assumptions
(`METAMASK_CARD_CASHBACK`), and navigation for activity details; wrong
parsing or bucketing could mislabel deposits vs transfers, though
changes are well tested.
> 
> **Overview**
> **Money activity** now treats Accounts API data as **card spends and
cashback (mUSD back)** instead of card-only rows. Parsing accepts
`METAMASK_CARD_CASHBACK`, types use `AccountsApiActivity` with `kind:
'card' | 'cashback'`, and list rows go through
**`AccountsApiActivityItem`** with shared display helpers.
> 
> **Filtering and merging** move into **`useMoneyActivityItems`**: home
and full activity views share the same buckets (cashback in
**Deposits**, card spends in **Transfers**), mock QA data includes a
sample cashback row, and merge logic dedupes by hash with stable sort
tie-breaks.
> 
> **Details UX** replaces the card bottom sheet and confirmations
**`CardTransactionDetails`** with **`MoneyApiActivityDetailsView`** on
the existing card-details route (`activity` param). Copy branches for
spend vs earned amounts and counterparty rows; the modal sheet route is
removed.
> 
> **Tests and copy** follow the rename (`useMoneyAccountApiActivity`,
`parseAccountsApiActivity`) and add coverage for cashback filtering and
the new details screen.
> 
> <sup>Reviewed by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/bugbot) for commit
6e5b192. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
[here](https://www.cursor.com/dashboard/bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
@runway-github runway-github Bot requested review from a team as code owners June 19, 2026 15:20
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

@mm-token-exchange-service mm-token-exchange-service Bot added the team-bots Bot team (for MetaMask Bot, Runway Bot, etc.) label Jun 19, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 Smart E2E Test Selection

⏭️ Smart E2E selection skipped - PR targets a release or stable branch (release/* or stable)

All E2E tests pre-selected.

View GitHub Actions results

@github-actions github-actions Bot added size-XL risk:medium AI analysis: medium risk labels Jun 19, 2026
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

risk:medium AI analysis: medium risk size-XL team-bots Bot team (for MetaMask Bot, Runway Bot, etc.)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant