Improve raster of timings - #61
Conversation
|
Are the raster timings in the EPI scripts correct already, or do we have to do some adjustments there as well? |
|
They need to be adapted. I will also add one more case with non-integer raster times. |
|
There is still a problem with the ADC dead time. For our current system defaults that is very short so it is never a problem. For other systems it can be longer. The ADC dead time I guess is only important between RF pulses and ADC events but most interpreters will simply throw an error if the time between block border and ADC event is less than the ADC dead time, independent if there is an RF event beforehand. One option would be to simply ensure that the gy blip gradient durations are always at least 2 * ADC dead time: https://github.com/ckolbPTB/mrseq/blob/e50a366dad901328fefc66c4bcd9e10b471c0416/src/mrseq/utils/EpiReadout.py#L225 @schuenke Can you think of a smarter way of how to solve this? |
|
Needs pulseq/pypulseq#417 |
No description provided.