Skip to content

[CI] Parity: fix upstream job links - #3536

Open
ethanwee1 wants to merge 1 commit into
ROCm:developfrom
ethanwee1:ew/parity-fix-job-links-develop
Open

[CI] Parity: fix upstream job links#3536
ethanwee1 wants to merge 1 commit into
ROCm:developfrom
ethanwee1:ew/parity-fix-job-links-develop

Conversation

@ethanwee1

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • record the workflow run ID for each downloaded shard job
  • build parity report links from the per-job run mapping instead of one overwritten run ID
  • retain the legacy single-run file as a fallback for older downloads

Test plan

  • Run Python syntax checks for both modified scripts
  • Verify the branch is limited to the downloader and report summarizer

Made with Cursor

The "Job ID" links in the parity summary were built by pairing every shard
dir's "_<job_id>" with a single "_wf_run_id" file. But the default,
distributed and inductor configs resolve to DIFFERENT upstream runs (e.g.
mi350 default+inductor come from a trunk push while distributed comes from
periodic / a trunk fallback), and they all unzip into the same rocm_xml
folder. "_wf_run_id" is overwritten per config (last write wins), so shards
from the other runs got a URL like runs/<trunk_run>/job/<distributed_job_id>
- a run the job never belonged to, which 404s ("busted" in the summary).

Concrete case: run 30444136839 (mi350) linked
runs/30416143612/job/90430654935, but job 90430654935 (mi350 distributed
shard 1) actually lives in run 30404499951.

download_testlogs now records a job_id -> run_id map in "_wf_run_ids.json"
next to the shard dirs (accumulated across configs), and
summarize_xml_testreports.py looks each shard's job id up in that map,
falling back to the legacy single "_wf_run_id" only when absent. Job URLs
are now built with the run that actually produced each shard.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant