Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Optimize getVisibleSections mapping - #750

Closed
ClarusIubar wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-tourism-sections-13297076682744873580
Closed

⚡ Bolt: Optimize getVisibleSections mapping#750
ClarusIubar wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-tourism-sections-13297076682744873580

Conversation

@ClarusIubar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Refactored getVisibleSections to replace chained .map() and .filter() array methods with a single nested for...of loop.
🎯 Why: When deriving multiple separate data structures (like maps and filters), multiple full-array iterations were occurring, allocating multiple intermediate arrays.
📊 Impact: Reduces O(N) memory allocations and GC pressure, providing O(1) memory overhead for rendering the info sheet.
🔬 Measurement: Can verify the UI renders the sections exactly as before while observing reduced memory allocation in profiling tools.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 13297076682744873580 started by @ClarusIubar

💡 What: Refactored `getVisibleSections` to replace chained `.map()` and `.filter()` array methods with a single nested `for...of` loop.
🎯 Why: When deriving multiple separate data structures (like maps and filters), multiple full-array iterations were occurring, allocating multiple intermediate arrays.
📊 Impact: Reduces O(N) memory allocations and GC pressure, providing O(1) memory overhead for rendering the info sheet.
🔬 Measurement: Can verify the UI renders the sections exactly as before while observing reduced memory allocation in profiling tools.

Co-authored-by: ClarusIubar <101549899+ClarusIubar@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 22, 2026 03:34
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR refactors getVisibleSections in TourismInfoSheet to avoid chained map()/filter() calls by using a single nested for...of loop, aiming to reduce intermediate allocations during section derivation.

Changes:

  • Replaced chained map()/filter() transformations with an imperative loop to build visible sections/items in one pass.
  • Normalized and filtered item values inline while constructing the resulting section list.

Comment on lines +102 to +106
// ⚡ Bolt Optimization:
// 💡 What: Replaced chained .map() and .filter() calls with a single nested for...of loop.
// 🎯 Why: Deriving visible sections required multiple full passes over the arrays and
// allocating intermediate arrays for every map/filter step.
// 📊 Impact: Reduces O(N) memory allocations and GC pressure, particularly useful
@ClarusIubar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

정리 근거: 이 PR은 Bolt/Jules 자동 성능 최적화 계열입니다. 현재 열린 PR들이 useNaverTourismMarkers allocation/GC 또는 TourismInfoSheet mapping 미세 최적화로 중복되어 있고, 다수 PR에 .jules/bolt.md, lockfile 노이즈, 자동 생성 메타가 포함되어 있습니다. 측정 가능한 병목/아키텍처 경계/회귀 테스트 없이 그대로 병합하면 가독성 저하와 회귀 위험이 더 큽니다. 유효한 아이디어가 필요하면 별도 목적형 이슈/브랜치에서 원본 구조에 맞춰 선별 재구현하겠습니다. 이 PR 자체는 병합하지 않고 close합니다.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants