CI runner

[lukaskollmer]

CI runner

♻️ Current situation & Problem

issue: we currently hardcode ubuntu for the linux CI, which isn't necessary anymore

⚙️ Release Notes

n/a

📚 Documentation

n/a

✅ Testing

n/a

Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

By creating and submitting this pull request, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines:

• I agree to follow the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

---

^{Need help on this PR? Tag /codesmith with what you need. Autofix is disabled.}

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the project’s automated build workflow to use the default runner selection.
  • Allowed the shared workflow to access repository secrets, improving compatibility with the CI setup.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: b095a022-277a-4d17-a3f3-3027b9bc17f2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7295e0c and 5f92d49.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/ci.yml

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• .github/workflows/ci.yml

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The CI job now invokes the reusable Swift package workflow without an explicit Linux runner list and with inherited secrets. The job-level permission settings remain in place.

Changes

Reusable CI workflow invocation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Workflow call inputs .github/workflows/ci.yml	The ci job removes the linux_runners input and adds secrets: inherit on the reusable workflow call.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• SchmiedmayerLab/ThreadLocal#1: Also updates the same .github/workflows/ci.yml reusable workflow invocation and its inputs.

Suggested labels

enhancement

Suggested reviewers

• PSchmiedmayer

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title is too generic and doesn’t clearly describe the CI workflow change or the removed Ubuntu runner hardcoding.	Rename it to something specific like 'Remove hardcoded Ubuntu runner from CI workflow'.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch lukas/runners

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

ℹ️ You can also turn on project coverage checks and project coverage reporting on Pull Request comment

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️