We actively support the following versions of the MASTERY-AI Framework with security updates:
| Framework Version | Library Version | Supported |
|---|---|---|
| v3.1.1 | 1.x.x | ✅ Yes |
| v3.1.0 | 0.9.x | ✅ Yes |
| v3.0.0 | 0.8.x | |
| < v3.0.0 | < 0.8.x | ❌ No |
- Current Major Version: Full security and bug fix support
- Previous Major Version: Security fixes only for 12 months
- Legacy Versions: No security support (upgrade recommended)
We take the security of the MASTERY-AI Framework seriously. If you discover a security vulnerability, please follow our responsible disclosure process.
Do not report security vulnerabilities through public GitHub issues.
Instead, please report security vulnerabilities through one of these channels:
-
GitHub Security Advisories (Preferred)
- Go to the Security tab
- Click "Report a vulnerability"
- Fill out the security advisory form
-
Direct Contact
- Email: security@mastery-ai-framework.org (when available)
- Subject: "SECURITY: [Brief Description]"
-
Encrypted Communication
- For highly sensitive reports, request our PGP key
- Encrypted reports ensure confidentiality during investigation
Please include as much of the following information as possible:
Vulnerability Details:
- Type of vulnerability (injection, authentication bypass, etc.)
- Framework component affected (core, API, pillar-specific, etc.)
- Attack vector and exploitation method
- Potential impact assessment
- Affected versions
Reproduction Information:
- Step-by-step reproduction instructions
- Minimal test case or proof of concept
- Environment details (Python version, OS, dependencies)
- Assessment input data that triggers the vulnerability
Assessment Context:
- Which pillar(s) or factor(s) are affected
- Impact on assessment accuracy or security
- Data exposure risks
- Potential for malicious manipulation of scores
We aim to respond to security reports according to this timeline:
- Initial Response: Within 48 hours
- Triage and Assessment: Within 5 business days
- Fix Development: Varies by severity (see below)
- Release and Disclosure: Coordinated with reporter
| Severity | Impact | Response Time | Fix Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | Remote code execution, data breach | 24 hours | 1-3 days |
| High | Privilege escalation, authentication bypass | 48 hours | 3-7 days |
| Medium | Information disclosure, DoS | 5 days | 1-2 weeks |
| Low | Minor information leakage | 1 week | Next release |
Critical Vulnerabilities:
- Assessment manipulation affecting all 148 factors
- Arbitrary code execution through assessment input
- Complete bypass of framework validation
- Mass data exfiltration from assessment results
High Vulnerabilities:
- Manipulation of pillar weights or scoring logic
- Authentication bypass in API endpoints
- Injection attacks through content analysis
- Privilege escalation in multi-tenant deployments
Medium Vulnerabilities:
- Information disclosure of assessment methodology
- Partial bypass of input validation
- DoS attacks on assessment engine
- Insecure default configurations
Low Vulnerabilities:
- Minor information leakage in logs
- Non-exploitable edge cases
- Informational security improvements
Input Validation:
- Comprehensive validation of assessment input data
- Sanitization of user-provided content
- Schema validation for API requests
- Rate limiting on assessment endpoints
Authentication & Authorization:
- API key-based authentication (where applicable)
- Role-based access control for different operations
- Secure session management
- Configurable access controls
Data Protection:
- No data retention by default
- Encrypted data transmission (HTTPS required)
- Secure handling of sensitive assessment data
- Anonymization options for assessment results
Infrastructure Security:
- Secure defaults in configuration
- Protection against common web vulnerabilities
- Audit logging for security events
- Regular security dependency updates
Assessment Security:
- Validation of framework mathematical consistency
- Protection against scoring manipulation
- Secure handling of proprietary assessment factors
- Integrity checks for framework components
API Security:
- Input validation for all endpoints
- Protection against injection attacks
- Secure error handling (no information leakage)
- Request/response logging for audit trails
Deployment Security:
# Use secure configuration
from mastery_ai import Config, AssessmentEngine
config = Config()
config.security.require_https = True
config.security.api_key_required = True
config.logging.audit_enabled = True
config.data.retention_disabled = True
engine = AssessmentEngine(config)API Security:
# Secure API usage
headers = {
'Authorization': 'Bearer your-api-key',
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}
# Validate and sanitize input
assessment_data = validate_input(raw_data)
response = requests.post(
'https://your-api.com/assess',
headers=headers,
json=assessment_data,
verify=True # Verify SSL certificates
)Secure Coding:
- Validate all inputs at API boundaries
- Use parameterized queries for database operations
- Implement proper error handling without information leakage
- Follow principle of least privilege
- Regular security testing and code reviews
Dependency Management:
- Keep all dependencies updated
- Regular security scanning of dependencies
- Use dependency pinning for production deployments
- Monitor for security advisories
We follow a coordinated disclosure process:
- Report Received: Acknowledge receipt within 48 hours
- Investigation: Technical team investigates and confirms
- Fix Development: Develop and test security fix
- Coordination: Work with reporter on disclosure timeline
- Release: Deploy fix and publish security advisory
- Public Disclosure: Full details after users have time to update
Security advisories are published through:
- GitHub Security Advisories
- Framework documentation
- Release notes with security sections
- Notification to registered users (when available)
For critical security issues, we may provide:
- Automatic security updates for supported versions
- Emergency patches outside regular release cycles
- Hotfixes for production deployments
- Migration tools for breaking security changes
Users are responsible for:
- Monitoring security advisories
- Testing updates in staging environments
- Applying security patches promptly
- Following security best practices
The MASTERY-AI Framework aims to comply with:
- OWASP Top 10 security recommendations
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework guidelines
- Industry-specific security requirements
- Data protection regulations (GDPR compliance)
We conduct regular security assessments:
- Static code analysis
- Dependency vulnerability scanning
- Penetration testing (annual)
- Third-party security reviews
- Primary Contact: security@mastery-ai-framework.org
- GitHub Security: Use Security tab for vulnerability reports
- Emergency Contact: Available for critical vulnerabilities
- Report non-sensitive security improvements through GitHub issues
- Participate in security discussions
- Contribute to security documentation
- Help educate other users about security best practices
We recognize security contributors through:
- Security acknowledgments in release notes
- Contributor recognition in documentation
- CVE credits where applicable
- Community security champion recognition
Security researchers who responsibly disclose vulnerabilities may be listed in our security hall of fame (with permission).
We support security research conducted in good faith:
- Research on your own MASTERY-AI Framework installation
- Responsible disclosure of findings
- No malicious exploitation of vulnerabilities
- Respect for user privacy and data protection
This security policy applies to:
- The MASTERY-AI Framework core library
- Official API endpoints and implementations
- Framework documentation and examples
- Official deployment tools and scripts
Out of Scope:
- Third-party implementations using the framework
- User-specific deployments and configurations
- Social engineering attacks
- Physical security of user installations
Thank you for helping keep the MASTERY-AI Framework and our community secure!
Last updated: January 2025