Skip to content

Add readiness evidence remediation queue - #119

Merged
YuzeJ21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/readiness-evidence-remediation
Aug 22, 2026
Merged

Add readiness evidence remediation queue#119
YuzeJ21 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/readiness-evidence-remediation

Conversation

@YuzeJ21

@YuzeJ21 YuzeJ21 commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • add a deterministic stdout-only readiness evidence remediation queue with text and JSON modes
  • rank proposed fundamentals and DCF promotions by independent evidence blockers while preserving exact composite sources and fail-closed withholding
  • add stable readiness snapshot identities, exact-path local interview-brief hygiene, tests, and operator guidance

Boundaries

  • inspection only; canonical apply, readiness materialization, and source-rights changes remain unauthorized
  • no canonical data, source-rights registry, readiness artifacts, UI routes, provider credentials, or research calculations changed
  • original readiness-preview output remains byte-identical to the baseline

Verification

  • 7,537 tests passed through make public-check
  • dashboard boot and render smoke passed
  • browser QA evidence, public wording, staged hygiene, Ruff, and git diff checks passed
  • deterministic JSON matched byte-for-byte across two real runs
  • protected data, outputs, and docs asset manifest remained unchanged
  • independent review: Critical 0, Important 0, Minor 0, READY

Research workflow evidence only; not investment advice or a recommendation.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f106e1f3a1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/readiness_preview.py
Comment on lines +164 to +168
row.append(value)
elif isinstance(value, (int, float)):
row.append(value)
else:
row.append(str(value))

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Normalize stable values before hashing snapshots

When a saved CSV contains a blank stable field, pd.read_csv represents it as NaN, while the in-memory readiness builder emits ""; compare_readiness_frames treats both as the same empty value, but this hash encodes them as null and "". Consequently an unchanged readiness report can have no_readiness_changes while exposing different saved and proposed identities, making these identifiers unreliable anchors. Hash the same normalized boolean/text values used by the comparison.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@YuzeJ21
YuzeJ21 merged commit 9626886 into main Aug 22, 2026
1 check passed
@YuzeJ21
YuzeJ21 deleted the codex/readiness-evidence-remediation branch August 22, 2026 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant