Skip to content

Add inspection-only Golden Evidence Cohort - #120

Merged
YuzeJ21 merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
codex/golden-evidence-cohort
Aug 23, 2026
Merged

Add inspection-only Golden Evidence Cohort#120
YuzeJ21 merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
codex/golden-evidence-cohort

Conversation

@YuzeJ21

@YuzeJ21 YuzeJ21 commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • add a deterministic five-role Golden Evidence Cohort packet from saved readiness and existing remediation evidence
  • expose text and JSON commands through make golden-evidence-cohort TOP_N=5 with no repository writes
  • preserve fail-closed source rights, provenance, field-scope, price-lineage, temporal, and method-fit boundaries

Cohort contract

  • three saved operating companies when supported
  • one operating-company evidence-gap control
  • one ETF/index/fund company-DCF method-fit exclusion
  • no padding when a supported role is unavailable
  • no ranking, recommendation, canonical apply, readiness materialization, or source-rights mutation

Verification

  • make public-check: 7,562 passed; dashboard and browser/public gates passed
  • affected suites: 61 passed
  • launcher determinism/no-write checks: 3 passed
  • independent final review: 0 Critical, 0 Important, 0 Minor
  • protected evidence manifest: 116 files byte-identical
  • readiness preview/remediation, project status, operations center, hygiene, wording, and pilot-boundary checks completed

Current data boundary

Saved readiness remains stale but tracked: prices 265/3538, fundamentals 23/3538, DCF 23/3538, peers 9/3538. The packet is inspection-only and does not activate any data or research conclusion.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 292719b42b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +285 to +289
as_of_date = _text(row.get("as_of_date"))
provenance = tuple(
field
for field, value in (("source", source_id), ("source_reference", source_ref), ("as_of_date", as_of_date))
if not value

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Reject invalid fundamental as-of dates

When a fundamentals row contains a nonempty but malformed as_of_date (for example, from a bad manual import), this value is treated as complete provenance, so approved numeric fields can enter usable_evidence_lanes and may make saved DCF evidence usable. Validate the date before clearing the provenance blocker so temporally invalid evidence remains withheld.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +579 to +583
ticker
for ticker in candidate_groups
if ticker not in selected
and _asset_type(ticker, saved_by_ticker, proposed_by_ticker, universe_by_ticker) in OPERATING_ASSET_TYPES
),

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Restrict the control role to candidates with evidence gaps

When the first distinct operating-company promotion has complete provenance, rights, field scope, and price evidence, it still satisfies this selection and is emitted as evidence_gap_control despite having no independent blockers. In that case the advertised negative control is absent—and _member can even report state="insufficient_evidence" alongside an empty blocker list—so require the selected candidate group to contain an actual evidence blocker.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@YuzeJ21
YuzeJ21 merged commit 80f70f2 into main Aug 23, 2026
1 check passed
@YuzeJ21
YuzeJ21 deleted the codex/golden-evidence-cohort branch August 23, 2026 00:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant