Skip to content

docs(codex): rewrite for proper plugin format#9

Merged
PipDscvr merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/codex-docs-redo
Apr 21, 2026
Merged

docs(codex): rewrite for proper plugin format#9
PipDscvr merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/codex-docs-redo

Conversation

@PipDscvr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Rewrite of the Codex integration doc to match the redone plugin in Atomicmemory-integrations#5. Supersedes the closed #8 (which documented the wrong plugin format).

  • Three install options: repo marketplace (recommended), personal marketplace, manual MCP config
  • Configure section with env-var surface mirroring packages/mcp-server/src/config.ts
  • Memory protocol skill section summarizing the shipped SKILL.md
  • MCP tools table and View source links to the correct files
  • Overview table: Codex row flipped to "🔧 Source available" with the correct install-surface label

Test plan

  • pnpm build passes with onBrokenLinks: 'throw'
  • Merge Atomicmemory-integrations#5 first so all source links resolve

…mat)

Follow-up to the redone Codex plugin in Atomicmemory-integrations#5.
The earlier Codex plugin used ~/.codex/config.toml; the real plugin
format is .codex-plugin/plugin.json + .codex-mcp.json + a
marketplace.json manifest (matching how mem0-plugin ships). Rewrite
the doc page around that:

- Three install options: repo marketplace (recommended), personal
  marketplace, manual MCP config
- Configure section with the env-var surface mirroring
  packages/mcp-server/src/config.ts
- Memory protocol skill section summarizing the shipped SKILL.md
  (on new task / after significant work / before context loss)
- MCP tools table pointing at SDK reference
- View source section with direct links to plugin.json,
  .codex-mcp.json, SKILL.md, and marketplace.example.json
- Overview table: Codex row flipped to "🔧 Source available" with
  the correct install surface label and source link
@PipDscvr PipDscvr merged commit 8451cf4 into main Apr 21, 2026
@PipDscvr PipDscvr deleted the feat/codex-docs-redo branch April 21, 2026 22:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant