Skip to content

docs: reflective-evidence citation policy for PR records - #48

Merged
aurascoper merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/quarantine-pr-citation
Jul 29, 2026
Merged

docs: reflective-evidence citation policy for PR records#48
aurascoper merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/quarantine-pr-citation

Conversation

@aurascoper

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Formalizes the reflective-log boundary as a standalone policy on main: evidence-class table, the claim+observation+hash citation rule, non-authority of reflective output (with per-lane rules for event labeling, client/transport PRs, and reconstructed ADRs), and source-pinning for external scaffolding.

Draft for operator review. No code or workflow changes; single new doc. The quarantine cascade scripts referenced already exist; their full documentation ships with the local-dialectic-review branch.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

aurascoper and others added 2 commits July 28, 2026 18:59
Fixes the boundary between private reflective/dialectic session logs and
anything that enters a PR record, ADR, or committed artifact: PRs cite
claim + observation + content hash + tool version, never transcript text;
one capture = one hash = one local manifest, never duplicated across
branches; reflective output is a hypothesis generator, not a reviewer or
normative authority; reconstructed ADRs are never retro-edited from later
reflective sessions; external scaffolding must be source-pinned and never
silently authorizes embeddings/runtime/label decisions.

The implementing mechanics already exist (quarantine_dialectic_corpus.py /
review_quarantined_dialectics.py); this standalone policy can land on main
independently of the quarantine cascade's feature branch.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…mation is not yet on main

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@aurascoper
aurascoper marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2026 01:13
@aurascoper
aurascoper merged commit e2c04a7 into main Jul 29, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant