Skip to content

Auth scope changes - #61

Open
RaggedStaff wants to merge 8 commits into
masterfrom
authScopeChanges
Open

Auth scope changes#61
RaggedStaff wants to merge 8 commits into
masterfrom
authScopeChanges

Conversation

@RaggedStaff

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR detailing changes to incorporate scope-based authorization within the DFC Standard

@RaggedStaff RaggedStaff self-assigned this Oct 2, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to Icebox ❄ in Tech meeting board Oct 2, 2025
@RaggedStaff RaggedStaff moved this from Icebox ❄ to To review ☕ in Tech meeting board Oct 2, 2025

@lecoqlibre lecoqlibre left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This work is not aligned with our efforts to move closer to the Solid international consensus especially our previous work on the WebID. For me the DFC should rather move to Solid-OIDC.

If this solution is a transition and a temporary-only solution it should be noticed.

Comment thread technical-specifications/authorization-strategy.md
Comment thread technical-specifications/authorization-strategy.md Outdated
@RaggedStaff

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@simonLouvet requests:

  1. Further detail of why this is required (more detail of the Data Permissioning Module).
  2. Include details of dfc-t:assignedScope & dfc-t:requiredScope

Comment thread technical-specifications/authorization-strategy.md Outdated
Comment thread technical-specifications/authorization-strategy.md Outdated
@RachL

RachL commented Nov 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lecoqlibre is there a documentation link/paragraph that we could add here to give info on how Solid-OIDC can answer permissions between users?

@lecoqlibre lecoqlibre left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK. There is still work to do but can start with this.

Couple of typos & added some links to orgs.
@RaggedStaff
RaggedStaff requested a review from lecoqlibre August 2, 2026 08:40
@RaggedStaff

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@lecoqlibre - I can't approve your changes as its my PR, and merging wasn't possible based on your approving review as you were the last pusher. I've pushed a small change, so hopefully (if you re-review) we can get this merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: To review ☕

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants