Create SECURITY.md - #844
Conversation
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdded ChangesSecurity Policy Documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@SECURITY.md`:
- Around line 5-21: Replace the placeholder support table in SECURITY.md with
the project’s actual supported versions and security-update status. Rewrite the
Reporting a Vulnerability section with the repository-specific reporting
channel, expected response timeline, triage and acceptance/decline outcomes, and
disclosure expectations; remove all GitHub template placeholder text.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
| Use this section to tell people about which versions of your project are | ||
| currently being supported with security updates. | ||
|
|
||
| | Version | Supported | | ||
| | ------- | ------------------ | | ||
| | 5.1.x | :white_check_mark: | | ||
| | 5.0.x | :x: | | ||
| | 4.0.x | :white_check_mark: | | ||
| | < 4.0 | :x: | | ||
|
|
||
| ## Reporting a Vulnerability | ||
|
|
||
| Use this section to tell people how to report a vulnerability. | ||
|
|
||
| Tell them where to go, how often they can expect to get an update on a | ||
| reported vulnerability, what to expect if the vulnerability is accepted or | ||
| declined, etc. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔒 Security & Privacy | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
printf 'Repository files relevant to version/release/security:\n'
git ls-files | rg '(^SECURITY\.md$|(^|/)(package\.json|Cargo\.toml|pyproject\.toml|composer\.json|pubspec\.yaml|setup\.py|README\.md|CHANGELOG|HISTORY|NEWS|VERSION|version\.|release\.|Releases|releases\.md)$|(^|/)github/workflows/)' || true
printf '\nSECURITY.md:\n'
if [ -f SECURITY.md ]; then cat -n SECURITY.md; else echo 'SECURITY.md not found'; fi
printf '\nPackage/version indicators:\n'
for f in package.json Cargo.toml pyproject.toml composer.json pubspec.yaml setup.py setup.cfg; do
if [ -f "$f" ]; then
echo "--- $f ---"
sed -n '1,120p' "$f"
fi
done
printf '\nREADME/Changelog version mentions (first matching files):\n'
for f in README.md CHANGELOG.md HISTORY.md NEWS.md; do
if [ -f "$f" ]; then
echo "--- $f top lines ---"
sed -n '1,120p' "$f" | rg -n -C 2 'version|Version|5\.1|5\.0|4\.0|release|Release|support|supported|SECURITY|security' || true
fi
doneRepository: dbpedia/extraction-framework
Length of output: 2963
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
python3 - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
p=Path('SECURITY.md')
if not p.exists():
print('SECURITY.md missing')
raise SystemExit
s=p.read_text().splitlines()
checks={}
checks['has_report_section']='Reporting a Vulnerability' in s[0:25] or any('report' in line.lower() for line in s)
checks['has_email_or_url']=any('e-mail' in line.lower() or '@' in line or 'https://' in line or 'http://' in line for line in s)
checks['has_timeline_word']=any(t in s[-25:] or 'timeline' in line.lower() for line in s[:35])
print(checks)
print('lines:')
for i,l in enumerate(s,1):
print(f'{i}: {l}')
PYRepository: dbpedia/extraction-framework
Length of output: 315
Replace the template placeholders with an actionable security policy.
SECURITY.md still uses GitHub’s default template text in Reporting a Vulnerability, so researchers have no repository-specific reporting channel, response timeline, triage outcomes, or disclosure expectations. Replace the placeholder version table with the project’s real supported versions before merging.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@SECURITY.md` around lines 5 - 21, Replace the placeholder support table in
SECURITY.md with the project’s actual supported versions and security-update
status. Rewrite the Reporting a Vulnerability section with the
repository-specific reporting channel, expected response timeline, triage and
acceptance/decline outcomes, and disclosure expectations; remove all GitHub
template placeholder text.



Summary by CodeRabbit