⚡ [performance improvement] Use set instead of list for keyword membership checks#30
Conversation
Co-authored-by: dioncx <148190661+dioncx@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
💡 What:
Replaced list literals (
[...]) with set literals ({...}) for constant keyword membership checks in the_detect_negationfunction withinjson_memory/smart.py.🎯 Why:$O(1)$ time complexity instead of an $O(N)$ linear search through a list. This provides a direct performance boost with no behavioral changes.
Python compiles
x in {"a", "b", "c"}into a fastfrozensetlookup, giving an📊 Measured Improvement:
Measured using
timeitfor 10,000,000 iterations:PR created automatically by Jules for task 6008077062722791509 started by @dioncx