docs: adopt video_to_gtm_architecture as GTM SSOT (F10)

[groupthinking]

Canonical issue

Closes #1444

Outcome

One editable Video → GTM Revenue Architecture v3.0 document lives in EventRelay docs/video_to_gtm_architecture.md. Three byte-identical external copies were replaced with pointer stubs so agents do not edit the wrong path.

Scope

• Included: docs/video_to_gtm_architecture.md (418 lines; SHA-256 041614982804fea2b355017efe168644f7ae27d890097b05c7ca9c06ee2f43a7)
• External (not in this PR): pointer stubs at Dev root, youtube-transcript-app, codex skill
• Explicitly excluded: AI Video Platform GTM Plan.md (different related doc, kept)

Risk

• Risk level: low
• Failure mode: docs-only add; external stubs point at this path
• Rollback: revert this PR; restore from _workspace_review/artifacts/f10-gtm-dedupe-* if needed

Verification

Head 46f1d4c64f32d832e558abc35180d8b55c6691c1.

• Three prior copies had identical SHA-256
• EventRelay docs copy present (418 lines)
• Required CI green on current head
• Review threads resolved

Production evidence

Not applicable — documentation SSOT only.

Agent handoff

• One canonical issue is linked
• No competing PR implements the same issue
• Acceptance criteria satisfied
• Required checks pass on the current head
• Human decision only for product/security/production approval

Agent provenance

Human-authored (Grok Build on Dev canonical tree).

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
v0-uvai	Ready	Preview, v0	Aug 7, 2026 7:32pm

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@groupthinking, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 46 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Repository UI (inherited), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 1505039a-825f-440e-9883-40f7bb541903

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8cd4a10 and 46f1d4c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/video_to_gtm_architecture.md

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Snapshot Warnings

⚠️: No snapshots were found for the head SHA 46f1d4c.

Ensure that dependencies are being submitted on PR branches and consider enabling retry-on-snapshot-warnings. See the documentation for more information and troubleshooting advice.

Scanned Files

None

[groupthinking]

@coderabbitai full review

Requesting explicitly because auto-review has not run on this PR at all. The CodeRabbit commit status on head 46f1d4c reads "Review skipped: excluded by label configuration" — the documentation label trips the inherited label gate, which is the defect #1425 is open to fix. A manual command bypasses the auto-review exclusion.

There are currently zero review threads on this PR, so this is a first pass rather than an incremental one.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

@groupthinking I will run a full first-pass review for PR #1445. The review will assess the documentation change despite the automatic label exclusion.

---

✏️ Learnings added

Learnt from: groupthinking
URL: https://github.com/groupthinking/EventRelay/pull/1445

Timestamp: 2026-08-07T19:35:26.451Z
Learning: In the EventRelay repository, the `documentation` label currently matches an inherited CodeRabbit label-exclusion configuration. Automatic reviews can be skipped for documentation-only pull requests. An explicit `coderabbitai full review` request bypasses this exclusion. Issue `#1425` tracks the configuration defect.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.

⚠️ Action not completed

Review rate limited.

---

Your included review limit is currently reached under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. This review may still proceed through usage-based billing if eligible. Your next included review will be available in 46 minutes.

[linear-code]

GRV-357