Update `napi` Rust crates to v3 (major) by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #7647 · hashintel/hash

(napi) validate status before copying data in env arraybuffer fallback (#3077)
(napi) validate status before copying in remaining TypedArray fallback paths (#3076)
(napi) validate status before copying in TypedArray owned ToNapiValue fallback (#3080)
(napi) validate status before copying in ArrayBuffer ToNapiValue fallback (#3079)
(napi) skip debug buffer tracking on wasm targets (#3078)

`v3.7.1`

Compare Source

Other

clippy fix for Rust 1.92.0 (#3058)

`v3.7.0`

Compare Source

Added

(napi) provide unsafe as_mut on ArrayBuffer (#3055)
(napi) support Promise.resolve/reject (#3053)

`v3.6.1`

Compare Source

Other

updated the following local packages: napi-sys

`v3.6.0`

Compare Source

Added

(napi-derive) add tracing feature for debug logging NAPI function calls (#3041)
(napi) add node_api_create_object_with_properties support for enum creation (#2990)

Fixed

(napi) bigInt comparison (#3039)
(napi) shutdown runtime at env cleanup on windows (#3026)

Other

(napi) add back pub NODE_VERSION_* (#3046)
(sys) add back non dyn-symbols behavior (#3045)
(napi) add Eq and PartialEq trait to BigInt (#3033)
update MSRV in README.md (#3023)

`v3.5.2`

Compare Source

Fixed

(deps) update rust crate convert_case to 0.11 (#3114)

`v3.5.1`

Compare Source

Other

updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

`v3.5.0`

Compare Source

Added

(napi-derive) add #[napi(async_iterator)] macro attribute (#3072)

`v3.4.0`

Compare Source

Added

(napi-derive) add tracing feature for debug logging NAPI function calls (#3041)

Fixed

(deps) update rust crate convert_case to 0.10 (#3031)

`v3.3.0`

Compare Source

Added

(napi-derive) add discriminant_case to allow changing case of discriminant (#2960)

Fixed

(deps) update rust crate ctor to v0.6.0 (#2951)

Other

(napi) bump rust-version (#2966)

`v3.2.4`

Compare Source

Other

updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

`v3.2.3`

Compare Source

Fixed

(napi) link issue on cargo test --features noop (#2872)
(deps) update rust crate ctor to v0.5.0 (#2865)

`v3.2.2`

Compare Source

Other

updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

`v3.2.1`

Compare Source

Other

updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

`v3.2.0`

Compare Source

Added

(napi) add ScopeGenerator trait (#2831)
make generator an iterator (#2784)

`v3.1.6`

Compare Source

Fixed

(napi) async task finally is not called (#2824) This was introduced in #2786, released in 3.1.0

`v3.1.5`

Compare Source

Fixed

(napi) relax the lifetime restriction in PromiseRaw callbacks (#2819)

`v3.1.4`

Compare Source

Fixed

(napi) the generic trait rectiction of Env::spawn should be ScopedTask (#2817)

`v3.1.3`

Compare Source

Other

(napi) optimize HashMap allocation in FromNapiValue implementation for HashMap (#2796)

`v3.1.2`

Compare Source

Other

updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

`v3.1.1`

Compare Source

Other

updated the following local packages: napi-derive-backend

`v3.1.0`

Compare Source

Added

(napi) provide ScopedTask to resolve JsValue with lifetime (#2786)

Other

pin release-plz action

`v3.0.0`

Compare Source

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

codecov · 2025-07-19T10:00:28Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.49%. Comparing base (a70891f) to head (23e056e).
⚠️ Report is 53 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7647      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.50%   62.49%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1318     1318              
  Lines      134219   134234      +15     
  Branches     5518     5520       +2     
==========================================
- Hits        83895    83894       -1     
- Misses      49409    49425      +16     
  Partials      915      915

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.40% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.19% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.38% <ø> (-0.01%)`	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`29.69% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.29% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`69.13% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`92.64% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

vercel · 2025-11-29T20:47:02Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 11, 2026 2:41pm
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 11, 2026 2:41pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Apr 11, 2026 2:41pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Apr 11, 2026 2:41pm

cursor · 2025-12-19T07:47:18Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Major-version upgrade of napi/napi-derive used for Node.js N-API bindings; potential for build failures or runtime ABI/behavior changes in crates exposing N-API modules.

Overview
Updates workspace dependency versions for Node.js N-API bindings by bumping napi and napi-derive from v2.16.x to 3.0.0 in Cargo.toml (with default-features = false unchanged).

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 23e056e. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

codspeed-hq · 2026-02-14T11:00:59Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates (23e056e) with main (72b0a7b)¹}

No successful run was found on main (a9d49dd) during the generation of this report, so 72b0a7b was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 23e056e. Configure here.}

cursor · 2026-04-11T14:34:35Z

+napi                               = { version = "3.0.0", default-features = false }
 napi-build                         = { version = "2.2.4", default-features = false }
-napi-derive                        = { version = "2.16.13", default-features = false }
+napi-derive                        = { version = "3.0.0", default-features = false }


Cargo.lock not updated for napi v3 version bump

High Severity

The Cargo.toml workspace dependencies now specify napi = "3.0.0" and napi-derive = "3.0.0", but Cargo.lock still pins napi at 2.16.17 and napi-derive at 2.16.13. These locked versions don't satisfy the ^3.0.0 constraint. The CI lint step runs cargo update --workspace --locked, which will fail because the lockfile is out of sync with the manifest. This makes the PR unbuildable as-is.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 23e056e. Configure here.}

github-actions · 2026-04-11T15:44:13Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.563 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 314 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.941 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.684 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.851 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.686 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.296 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.604 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.860 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.165 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.167 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.744 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.122 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.335 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.510 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.523 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.913 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.167 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.534 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.573 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$53.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$45.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 218 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.567 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$49.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$43.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.122 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$61.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.983 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$60.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.386 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$55.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 510 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.451 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$45.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$271 \mathrm{ms} \pm 888 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$18.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.293 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.445 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.777 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.919 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.380 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.762 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.115 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.604 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$34.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$34.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.497 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$34.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 341 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$34.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.774 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$33.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$34.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.740 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.587 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$91.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$147 \mathrm{ms} \pm 679 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$99.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 515 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 608 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 575 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 548 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 721 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 600 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 500 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 474 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 562 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 541 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$188 \mathrm{ms} \pm 813 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$173 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.43 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}12.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$40.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 218 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.911 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$531 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.04 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-3.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge July 19, 2025 08:20

hashdotai previously approved these changes Jul 19, 2025

View reviewed changes

github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jul 19, 2025

hash-worker Bot assigned TimDiekmann Jul 19, 2025

hash-worker Bot requested a review from a team July 19, 2025 09:06

TimDiekmann dismissed hashdotai’s stale review via ee4ebe9 July 20, 2025 21:51

github-actions Bot added area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels Jul 20, 2025

TimDiekmann assigned indietyp and unassigned TimDiekmann Jul 20, 2025

vercel Bot deployed to Preview July 20, 2025 22:05 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates branch from ee4ebe9 to 047e69d Compare September 2, 2025 08:19

github-actions Bot removed area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels Sep 2, 2025

hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2025

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview September 2, 2025 08:33 View deployment

hash-worker Bot dismissed hashdotai’s stale review via c98d454 September 8, 2025 07:15

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates branch from 047e69d to c98d454 Compare September 8, 2025 07:15

hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview September 8, 2025 07:27 View deployment

hash-worker Bot dismissed hashdotai’s stale review via 5b1740f September 11, 2025 08:14

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates branch from c98d454 to 5b1740f Compare September 11, 2025 08:14

hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview September 11, 2025 08:24 View deployment

hash-worker Bot dismissed hashdotai’s stale review via 6daed41 September 19, 2025 12:56

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates branch from 5b1740f to 6daed41 Compare September 19, 2025 12:56

hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2025

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview September 19, 2025 13:15 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates branch from 6daed41 to 4c2140e Compare October 6, 2025 13:27

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash November 7, 2025 14:01 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates branch from 6d0176f to 4fb511d Compare November 10, 2025 04:49

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign November 10, 2025 04:52 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash November 10, 2025 05:01 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates branch from 4fb511d to ca8420d Compare November 29, 2025 20:46

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign November 29, 2025 20:50 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut November 29, 2025 20:51 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash November 29, 2025 21:00 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates branch from ca8420d to 72c619d Compare December 2, 2025 09:49

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign December 2, 2025 09:52 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut December 2, 2025 09:54 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash December 2, 2025 10:02 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates branch from 72c619d to dd93ec2 Compare December 2, 2025 15:16

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign December 2, 2025 15:19 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut December 2, 2025 15:20 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash December 2, 2025 15:29 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates branch from dd93ec2 to ff7d766 Compare December 7, 2025 09:43

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign December 7, 2025 09:47 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut December 7, 2025 09:48 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash December 7, 2025 09:56 View deployment

hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates branch from ff7d766 to ed75f88 Compare December 9, 2025 09:16

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign December 9, 2025 09:22 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut December 9, 2025 09:22 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash December 9, 2025 09:30 View deployment

Update napi Rust crates to v3

23e056e

cursor Bot reviewed Apr 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update `napi` Rust crates to v3 (major)#7647

Update `napi` Rust crates to v3 (major)#7647
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
deps/rs/major-napi-rust-crates

hash-worker Bot commented Jul 19, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jul 19, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Nov 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Dec 19, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Feb 14, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Uh oh!

cursor Bot Apr 11, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Apr 11, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Conversation

hash-worker Bot commented Jul 19, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release Notes

Fixed

Fixed

Other

Fixed

Fixed

Added

Fixed

Other

Added

Other

Added

Fixed

Other

Fixed

Other

Added

Added

Fixed

Added

Fixed

Other

Other

Fixed

Other

Other

Added

Fixed

Fixed

Fixed

Other

Other

Other

Added

Other

Configuration

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jul 19, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Nov 29, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented Dec 19, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Feb 14, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cursor Bot Apr 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Cargo.lock not updated for napi v3 version bump

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Apr 11, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

hash-worker Bot commented Jul 19, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Jul 19, 2025 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Nov 29, 2025 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented Dec 19, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Feb 14, 2026 •

edited

Loading