chore(ci): make Scorecard periodic — drop push and pull_request triggers - #5
Merged
Conversation
Scorecard measures the REPOSITORY's supply-chain posture, not the change under
review. The estate's signal-discipline standard puts repository-level
measurements in the PERIODIC tier: on a schedule against the default branch,
feeding one dashboard — not on every event.
Measured across 303 scorecard workflows before this sweep:
199 push, schedule, workflow_dispatch
93 branch_protection_rule, schedule, push
1 push, pull_request, schedule, workflow_dispatch
1 schedule, workflow_dispatch <- the target shape
So roughly 292 repositories ran a full posture scan on EVERY push to the
default branch. That is pure cost: a supply-chain score cannot meaningfully
change between two consecutive merges, and it never gated anything.
WHAT IS DELIBERATELY KEPT:
schedule the point of the tier
workflow_dispatch manual re-run when one is actually wanted
branch_protection_rule event-driven re-measurement of precisely what
Scorecard scores. It fires on a settings change, not
per pull request, so it does not violate the PERIODIC
rule — and it keeps the score honest after exactly
the change most likely to alter it.
Only `push` and `pull_request` are removed. `pull_request` existed in one
repository and was the genuine violation; `push` was the cost.
Related, and the reason this matters beyond minutes: Scorecard was ALSO
required as a `code_scanning` tool in 78 repositories at alertsThreshold=all,
while producing code-scanning results in essentially none — because it does not
emit per-commit SARIF. That made it an estate-wide merge blocker asking to do
something it does not do. Those requirements have been removed separately.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan D.A. Jewell <6759885+hyperpolymath@users.noreply.github.com>
hyperpolymath
enabled auto-merge
August 11, 2026 08:54
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Scorecard measures the REPOSITORY's supply-chain posture, not the change under review. The estate's signal-discipline standard puts repository-level measurements in the PERIODIC tier: on a schedule against the default branch, feeding one dashboard — not on every event.
Measured across 303 scorecard workflows before this sweep:
199 push, schedule, workflow_dispatch
93 branch_protection_rule, schedule, push
1 push, pull_request, schedule, workflow_dispatch
1 schedule, workflow_dispatch <- the target shape
So roughly 292 repositories ran a full posture scan on EVERY push to the default branch. That is pure cost: a supply-chain score cannot meaningfully change between two consecutive merges, and it never gated anything.
WHAT IS DELIBERATELY KEPT:
schedule the point of the tier
workflow_dispatch manual re-run when one is actually wanted
branch_protection_rule event-driven re-measurement of precisely what
Scorecard scores. It fires on a settings change, not
per pull request, so it does not violate the PERIODIC
rule — and it keeps the score honest after exactly
the change most likely to alter it.
Only
pushandpull_requestare removed.pull_requestexisted in one repository and was the genuine violation;pushwas the cost.Related, and the reason this matters beyond minutes: Scorecard was ALSO required as a
code_scanningtool in 78 repositories at alertsThreshold=all, while producing code-scanning results in essentially none — because it does not emit per-commit SARIF. That made it an estate-wide merge blocker asking to do something it does not do. Those requirements have been removed separately.Summary
Changes
RSR Quality Checklist
Required
just testor equivalent)just fmtor equivalent)unsafeblocks without// SAFETY:commentsbelieve_me,unsafeCoerce,Obj.magic,Admitted,sorry).envfiles includedAs Applicable
.machine_readable/descriptiles/STATE.a2mlupdated (if project state changed).machine_readable/descriptiles/ECOSYSTEM.a2mlupdated (if integrations changed).machine_readable/descriptiles/META.a2mlupdated (if architectural decisions changed)TOPOLOGY.mdupdated (if architecture changed)CHANGELOGor release notes updatedsrc/interface/abi/andsrc/interface/ffi/consistent)Testing
Screenshots