Skip to content

igvm_defs, igvm: introduce corim measurement header#99

Merged
chris-oo merged 13 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
chris-oo:corim-header
Jun 3, 2026
Merged

igvm_defs, igvm: introduce corim measurement header#99
chris-oo merged 13 commits into
microsoft:mainfrom
chris-oo:corim-header

Conversation

@chris-oo

@chris-oo chris-oo commented Nov 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Introduce a CoRIM document and CoRIM signature header to allow CoRIM payloads to be described for a given platform. This is the bare-minimum support to start proving out CoRIM support for IGVM files, with more support tracked by #115.

This is gated behind a new corim feature.

Comment thread igvm_defs/src/lib.rs Outdated
@mingweishih

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CoRIM spec does not seem to support detached mode —- waiting for confirmation ietf-rats-wg/draft-ietf-rats-corim#514

@mingweishih

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

There is a proposal to add detached mode support: ietf-rats-wg/draft-ietf-rats-corim#520

Comment thread igvm_defs/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread igvm_defs/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread igvm_defs/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread igvm_defs/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread igvm_defs/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread igvm_defs/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread igvm_defs/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread igvm_defs/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment thread igvm/src/lib.rs
@chris-oo chris-oo changed the title [WIP] igvm_defs: introduce corim measurement header igvm_defs, igvm: introduce corim measurement header Mar 24, 2026
@chris-oo chris-oo marked this pull request as ready for review March 24, 2026 00:19
@chris-oo chris-oo requested a review from a team as a code owner March 24, 2026 00:19
Comment thread igvm_defs/src/lib.rs Outdated
@chris-oo chris-oo merged commit a706b19 into microsoft:main Jun 3, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants