Skip to content

Add ogc.osc.prov-processing-step: PROV profile for a single geospatial processing step - #16

Open
nsnarayanam wants to merge 13 commits into
ogcincubator:masterfrom
nsnarayanam:master
Open

Add ogc.osc.prov-processing-step: PROV profile for a single geospatial processing step#16
nsnarayanam wants to merge 13 commits into
ogcincubator:masterfrom
nsnarayanam:master

Conversation

@nsnarayanam

Copy link
Copy Markdown

D104 (Aganitha), Activities 1 and 2. Supersedes #13 and #14, which were built from earlier branches.

A profile of ogc.ogc-utils.prov constrained to a single geospatial processing step, adding a required processType link to a registered process type. That is the link PROV-O and Processes Part 5 do not themselves provide, and where the profile-plus-register pattern closes.

Nine examples, all validating, profiled against a drought intelligence workflow we run over Telangana.

On the self-assembly point from the 12 Aug call: the examples form one connected provenance graph with ten resolving links. From the projection a consumer can walk back through inference to the fitted model and CDSI, then to VCI and SMDI, and finally to ingest.

Writing the chain out surfaced a real gap: CDSI consumed an SMDI entity no recorded activity produced. That step is now included, which is a small argument for chaining as a validation technique rather than only a demo.

Two examples cover machine learning: training generates a fitted model entity, and inference consumes that same entity.

Flagged as conflicting: the fork has diverged from master over three weeks. The conflicts are on scaffolding files, not content. The substantive addition is _sources/prov-processing-step/. Happy to rebase if you'd prefer it clean.

@nsnarayanam

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Also included: a one-word fix to _sources/ontology/openscience/bblock.json.

The master build is currently failing, locally and in CI, on:

Invalid reference to bblock ogc.contrib.stac.extensions.processes-ontology from ogc.osc.ontology.openscience

The STAC register publishes processing-ontology, not processes-ontology. Correcting the identifier makes the full build pass, all 21 blocks.

Happy to split this into its own PR if you'd rather keep it separate from the D104 block.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant