Skip to content

chore: use neutral actor identifiers and paths across the tree - #1372

Open
ohdearquant wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
chore/public-hygiene-sweep
Open

chore: use neutral actor identifiers and paths across the tree#1372
ohdearquant wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
chore/public-hygiene-sweep

Conversation

@ohdearquant

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Replaces machine-specific paths and internal identifiers with neutral equivalents throughout the tree. Actor and namespace strings in tests, doc comments, and configuration examples now use a generic agent: prefix; a benchmark fixture references a repository-relative targets path instead of an absolute workspace path; workflow and script comments use role-neutral wording.

No behavior change — every substituted value is test data or a documentation example, and the diff is a line-for-line substitution. The Gate's lambda actor kind is a declared part of the policy contract and is left unchanged, as are the BM25 benchmark corpus and search-test fixture text that happen to contain the same word.

Gates run from the worktree: cargo fmt --all -- --check, cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -D warnings, cargo test --workspace, and cargo check --workspace.

Leo and others added 4 commits July 25, 2026 16:50
Replace machine-specific paths and internal identifiers with neutral
equivalents. Actor and namespace strings in tests, doc comments, and
configuration examples now use a generic `agent:` prefix; benchmark
fixtures reference a repository-relative targets path instead of an
absolute workspace path; workflow and script comments use role-neutral
wording.

No behavior change: the substituted values are test data and
documentation examples only. The Gate's `lambda` actor kind is a
declared part of the policy contract and is unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ohdearquant
ohdearquant marked this pull request as ready for review July 25, 2026 21:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant