chore(deps): refresh dependencies - #157
Conversation
|
🦞👀 Pull request received. I will update this pull request when review starts. |
|
Codex review: needs maintainer review before merge. Reviewed August 17, 2026, 4:35 AM ET / 08:35 UTC. ClawSweeper reviewWhat this changesThis PR refreshes direct and indirect Go modules, local and CI analysis-tool versions, and pinned CodeQL and TruffleHog workflow actions. Merge readinessKeep this collaborator-authored PR open for normal review. The six-file refresh is coherent and preserves immutable action pins, but the updated analysis, lint, test, and release checks are still running. Priority: P3 Review scores
Verification
How this fits togetherSlacrawl’s Go module graph supplies its Slack-export CLI and package tests, while GitHub workflows install analysis tools and run security scans. This PR updates those build-time inputs and their validation path. flowchart LR
A[Go module versions] --> B[Dependency graph]
B --> C[CLI and package tests]
D[Tool and action pins] --> E[CI security checks]
C --> F[Release validation]
E --> F
Before merge
Agent review detailsSecurityNone. Review metrics
Root-cause clusterRelationship: Members:
Proposal only: this assessment does not dispatch repair, suppress jobs, mutate sibling items, close, or merge anything. Merge-risk optionsMaintainer options:
Technical reviewBest possible solution: Land the consolidated refresh after the remaining checks pass, then close the fully subsumed Dependabot PRs at #153, #154, #155, and #156. Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue? Not applicable: this is a dependency-maintenance PR, not a report of a reproducible product failure. Is this the best way to solve the issue? Yes: consolidating overlapping dependency updates keeps one coherent module graph and one set of CI action pins; the remaining CI runs are the appropriate compatibility check. AGENTS.md: not found in the target repository. Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against b793612bfa8a. LabelsLabel changes:
Label justifications:
EvidenceWhat I checked:
Likely related people:
Rank-up movesOptional improvements that raise the rating; they are not merge blockers.
Rating scale
Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality. Workflow
|
Summary
Moved
Held
Proof