Skip to content

feat(ui): rename task taxonomy fields for business users (SPEC-002, Task 45f280ed) - #114

Merged
JustAGhosT merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
feat/45f280ed-taxonomy-renaming
Aug 14, 2026
Merged

feat(ui): rename task taxonomy fields for business users (SPEC-002, Task 45f280ed)#114
JustAGhosT merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
feat/45f280ed-taxonomy-renaming

Conversation

@JustAGhosT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Implements SPEC-002 business taxonomy display-name mapping for Baton task 45f280ed.
  • Updates options labels in \ ypes.ts\ for \WORK_TYPE_OPTIONS\ ('Category / Work Type'), \TIME_HORIZON_OPTIONS\ ('Planning Horizon'), \EXECUTION_MODE_OPTIONS\ ('Execution Approach'), \OUTCOME_TYPE_OPTIONS\ ('Target Deliverable'), \CONFIDENCE_OPTIONS\ ('Certainty & Risk'), \IMPACT_AREA_OPTIONS\ ('Business Impact'), and \CLOSEOUT_REQUIREMENT_OPTIONS\ ('Completion Criteria').
  • Updates field labels in \TaskDetail.tsx\ ('Intake & Governance') and placeholders in \AddTaskForm.tsx.
  • Verified with 73 passing Vitest unit tests (\TaskTaxonomyRenaming.test.ts) and clean production build.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@JustAGhosT, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 24 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: a2320ba3-b4d1-4c1a-a4d3-34966b80cfdc

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 10433e8 and d422e0f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • frontend/src/components/AddTaskForm.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/TaskDetail.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/TaskTaxonomyRenaming.test.ts
  • frontend/src/types.ts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@JustAGhosT

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@JustAGhosT
JustAGhosT merged commit 2dce124 into main Aug 14, 2026
3 checks passed
@JustAGhosT
JustAGhosT deleted the feat/45f280ed-taxonomy-renaming branch August 14, 2026 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant