Switch to retentive outputs#20
Conversation
(cherry picked from commit ce8582f)
Summary of ChangesHello @mzueva, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the stability of the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request successfully switches the graphPFrame and table outputs to use retentiveOutputWithStatus. This change aligns with the pull request title and description. However, it's important to consider the implications of this retentive behavior on downstream consumers of these outputs to ensure data consistency and expected user experience.
| * OUTPUTS * | ||
| *************************/ | ||
| .outputWithStatus('graphPFrame', (ctx) => { | ||
| .retentiveOutputWithStatus('graphPFrame', (ctx) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The change from outputWithStatus to retentiveOutputWithStatus for graphPFrame implies that this output will now retain its last successfully computed value even if subsequent computations fail or return undefined. Please ensure that all consumers of this output are aware of this change and handle potentially stale data appropriately. For example, if a UI component previously expected an undefined output to clear its display, it might now show old data. This is a significant behavioral change that could lead to unexpected user experiences if not properly managed downstream.
| return ctx.outputs?.resolve('rarefactionPFrame')?.getPColumns()?.map((p) => p.spec); | ||
| }) | ||
| .outputWithStatus('table', (ctx) => { | ||
| .retentiveOutputWithStatus('table', (ctx) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similarly, the switch to retentiveOutputWithStatus for the table output means it will retain its last valid state. It's important to verify that any components consuming this table output are designed to handle this retentive behavior, especially concerning how they react to situations where new data might be undefined or an error, but the output still provides the previous valid data.
(cherry picked from commit ce8582f)