Skip to content

Initialize line_sender_buffer using sender.new_buffer()#390

Open
pmull18 wants to merge 4 commits intoquestdb:mainfrom
pmull18:patch-1
Open

Initialize line_sender_buffer using sender.new_buffer()#390
pmull18 wants to merge 4 commits intoquestdb:mainfrom
pmull18:patch-1

Conversation

@pmull18
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pmull18 pmull18 commented Mar 17, 2026

Current documentation assumes the existence of a default constructor for line_sender_buffer, which does not exist. Not a vital change, but took me longer than I care to admit to figure out that's why my project wasn't compiling.

pmull18 added 2 commits March 16, 2026 20:12
Current documentation assumes the existence of a default constructor, which does not exist. Not a vital change, but took me longer than I care to admit to figure out that's why my project wasn't compiling.
jerrinot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2026
Pin gitleaks/gitleaks-action to a full commit SHA (v2.3.9) instead of
the mutable v2 tag, so a compromise of the upstream repo or tag can't
silently change what runs in CI.

Skip the step when GITLEAKS_LICENSE is empty. Pull requests from forks
don't receive org secrets, which was causing the check to fail on
external contributor PRs (e.g. #390).
jerrinot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2026
…ng (#419)

Pin gitleaks/gitleaks-action to a full commit SHA (v2.3.9) instead of
the mutable v2 tag, so a compromise of the upstream repo or tag can't
silently change what runs in CI.

Skip the step when GITLEAKS_LICENSE is empty. Pull requests from forks
don't receive org secrets, which was causing the check to fail on
external contributor PRs (e.g. #390).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants