Create datadog-synthetics.yml - #144
Conversation
Signed-off-by: danialzivehdar <243804543+danialzivehdar1992-hue@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Note Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported. |
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 56 minutes and 48 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. Walkthrough新增一个 Datadog Synthetics GitHub Actions 工作流，并新增一个“获取文件 → 文档解析”的工作流步骤链。 ChangesDatadog Synthetics 工作流接入
文件获取与文档解析流程
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/datadog-synthetics.yml:
- Line 27: The actions/checkout@v4 step is missing the persist-credentials
configuration which is a security best practice. Add the with clause to the
actions/checkout@v4 step and set persist-credentials to false to disable Git
credential persistence in the runner, preventing accidental leakage of the
GITHUB_TOKEN even though this workflow does not push code back to the
repository.
- Line 27: The actions/checkout action is currently pinned to version tag v4
instead of a specific commit hash, which poses a supply chain security risk
since version tags can be re-tagged. Replace the version tag reference in the
actions/checkout@v4 line with the full commit SHA hash that corresponds to the
v4 release. This ensures the workflow uses an immutable reference to a specific
commit rather than a mutable version tag.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 0e5ff518-b476-4bce-97a8-d92823435b6c
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/datadog-synthetics.yml
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
|
|
||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: actions/checkout@v4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
添加 persist-credentials: false 来禁用 Git 凭证持久化。
默认情况下，actions/checkout 会将 GITHUB_TOKEN 作为 Git 凭证保留在运行器中。虽然此工作流不会将代码推送回仓库，但禁用凭证持久化是一个安全最佳实践，可以降低意外泄露的风险。
🧰 Tools
🪛 zizmor (1.25.2)
[warning] 27-30: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts (artipacked): does not set persist-credentials: false
(artipacked)
[error] 27-27: unpinned action reference (unpinned-uses): action is not pinned to a hash (required by blanket policy)
(unpinned-uses)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In @.github/workflows/datadog-synthetics.yml at line 27, The actions/checkout@v4
step is missing the persist-credentials configuration which is a security best
practice. Add the with clause to the actions/checkout@v4 step and set
persist-credentials to false to disable Git credential persistence in the
runner, preventing accidental leakage of the GITHUB_TOKEN even though this
workflow does not push code back to the repository.
将 actions/checkout 操作固定到特定的提交哈希值。
当前配置使用版本标签 v4，而非提交哈希值。GitHub 的版本标签可以被重新标记，存在供应链安全风险。为确保安全性，应将其锁定到特定的提交 SHA。建议参照 Datadog 操作的做法，使用完整的提交哈希值。
🔐 建议的修复方案
steps:
- - uses: actions/checkout@v4
+ - uses: actions/checkout@b4ffde65f46336ab88eb53b808aeb3b2f405076e # v4.1.1
+ with:
+ persist-credentials: false📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - uses: actions/checkout@v4 | |
| steps: | |
| - uses: actions/checkout@b4ffde65f46336ab88eb53b808aeb3b2f405076e # v4.1.1 | |
| with: | |
| persist-credentials: false |
🧰 Tools
🪛 zizmor (1.25.2)
[warning] 27-30: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts (artipacked): does not set persist-credentials: false
(artipacked)
[error] 27-27: unpinned action reference (unpinned-uses): action is not pinned to a hash (required by blanket policy)
(unpinned-uses)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In @.github/workflows/datadog-synthetics.yml at line 27, The actions/checkout
action is currently pinned to version tag v4 instead of a specific commit hash,
which poses a supply chain security risk since version tags can be re-tagged.
Replace the version tag reference in the actions/checkout@v4 line with the full
commit SHA hash that corresponds to the v4 release. This ensures the workflow
uses an immutable reference to a specific commit rather than a mutable version
tag.
Signed-off-by: danialzivehdar <243804543+danialzivehdadr@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: danialzivehdar <243804543+danialzivehdadr@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@ファイルを取得`:
- Line 21: 该处把外部解析 endpoint 直接硬编码进了流程配置，需要改为通过环境变量或 secret 注入。请在相关配置/初始化位置（包含
endpoint 的对象或常量）移除固定 URL，并改成从配置读取，确保项目级路由 key 不再出现在仓库中且便于环境切换与轮换。
- Around line 17-26: `d_f_analyze_document_1` currently ends with
`wait_for_result: false`, so the workflow only gets a `document_id` and never
verifies the analysis outcome. Update this step to either wait for the
`DFAnalyzeDocument` result directly, or add a follow-up polling/branching path
keyed on `document_id` that handles success and failure before the workflow
completes. Make sure the final result of the flow reflects the document analysis
status, not just submission.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
| +d_f_analyze_document_1: | ||
| action>: DFAnalyzeDocument | ||
| display_name>: 'Document Forceでドキュメントを解析' | ||
| provider_id: documentforce_03f3151d6f9accddcffa | ||
| endpoint: 'https://app.aipuncher.com/api/v2/analyse/****************' | ||
| file: +get_file_1 | ||
| tags: | ||
| AUTORO DevOps: | ||
| - '開発テストタグ' | ||
| wait_for_result: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
# Locate the workflow file and inspect surrounding context around the referenced lines.
git ls-files | rg -n 'ファイルを取得|get_file|analyse|AnalyzeDocument|DFAnalyzeDocument' || trueRepository: react-component/footer
Length of output: 160
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
# Locate the workflow file and inspect surrounding context around the referenced lines.
git ls-files | rg -n 'ファイルを取得|get_file|analyse|AnalyzeDocument|DFAnalyzeDocument' || trueRepository: react-component/footer
Length of output: 160
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
# Search for the workflow and key identifiers.
git ls-files | sed 's#^#./#' | while read -r f; do
case "$f" in
*.yml|*.yaml|*.json|*.jsonnet|*.toml|*.tf|*.txt|*.md)
if rg -n -H --no-heading 'wait_for_result|DFAnalyzeDocument|document_id|analyse|Document Force|ファイルを取得' "$f" >/tmp/match.$$ 2>/dev/null; then
echo "==> $f"
cat /tmp/match.$$
fi
;;
esac
done
rm -f /tmp/match.$$Repository: react-component/footer
Length of output: 160
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
# Find any tracked files that mention the key identifiers or the Japanese title.
git ls-files -z | python3 - <<'PY'
import sys, subprocess, os, re, pathlib
files = sys.stdin.buffer.read().split(b'\0')
patterns = [b'wait_for_result', b'DFAnalyzeDocument', b'document_id', b'Document Force', 'ファイルを取得'.encode('utf-8'), b'analyse']
for fb in files:
if not fb:
continue
f = fb.decode('utf-8', errors='surrogateescape')
try:
data = pathlib.Path(f).read_text(encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore')
except Exception:
continue
if any(p.decode('utf-8', errors='ignore') in data for p in patterns):
print(f)
PYRepository: react-component/footer
Length of output: 164
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
# Find any tracked files that mention the key identifiers or the Japanese title.
git ls-files -z | python3 - <<'PY'
import sys, pathlib
files = sys.stdin.buffer.read().split(b'\0')
patterns = [
'wait_for_result',
'DFAnalyzeDocument',
'document_id',
'Document Force',
'ファイルを取得',
'analyse',
]
for fb in files:
if not fb:
continue
f = fb.decode('utf-8', errors='surrogateescape')
try:
data = pathlib.Path(f).read_text(encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore')
except Exception:
continue
if any(p in data for p in patterns):
print(f)
PYRepository: react-component/footer
Length of output: 164
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
# Inspect tracked file names and look for the likely workflow file.
printf 'Top-level tracked files:\n'
git ls-files | sed -n '1,200p'
printf '\nCandidates containing the Japanese title:\n'
git ls-files | rg 'ファイルを取得|analyse|document|workflow|yaml|yml|json$'Repository: react-component/footer
Length of output: 1070
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
python3 - <<'PY'
import os, sys, pathlib, subprocess
# Find the tracked file whose basename is the Japanese title.
target = None
for f in subprocess.check_output(['git', 'ls-files', '-z']).split(b'\0'):
if not f:
continue
name = f.decode('utf-8', errors='surrogateescape')
if os.path.basename(name) == 'ファイルを取得':
target = name
break
print(target or 'NOT_FOUND')
if target:
print('\n--- file with line numbers ---')
with open(target, encoding='utf-8', errors='replace') as fh:
for i, line in enumerate(fh, 1):
if 1 <= i <= 80:
print(f'{i:4d}: {line.rstrip()}')
PYRepository: react-component/footer
Length of output: 1260
补上解析结果判定
wait_for_result: false 让这一步只拿到 document_id 就结束了，当前文件里也没有基于 document_id 的轮询或失败分支。若解析是异步的，这里不会把“解析成功”纳入工作流结果。要么改为等待结果，要么补上后续的轮询/失败处理。
🔧 最小修正示例
- wait_for_result: false
+ wait_for_result: true📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| +d_f_analyze_document_1: | |
| action>: DFAnalyzeDocument | |
| display_name>: 'Document Forceでドキュメントを解析' | |
| provider_id: documentforce_03f3151d6f9accddcffa | |
| endpoint: 'https://app.aipuncher.com/api/v2/analyse/****************' | |
| file: +get_file_1 | |
| tags: | |
| AUTORO DevOps: | |
| - '開発テストタグ' | |
| wait_for_result: false | |
| d_f_analyze_document_1: | |
| action>: DFAnalyzeDocument | |
| display_name>: 'Document Forceでドキュメントを解析' | |
| provider_id: documentforce_03f3151d6f9accddcffa | |
| endpoint: 'https://app.aipuncher.com/api/v2/analyse/****************' | |
| file: +get_file_1 | |
| tags: | |
| AUTORO DevOps: | |
| - '開発テストタグ' | |
| wait_for_result: true |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@ファイルを取得` around lines 17 - 26, `d_f_analyze_document_1` currently ends with
`wait_for_result: false`, so the workflow only gets a `document_id` and never
verifies the analysis outcome. Update this step to either wait for the
`DFAnalyzeDocument` result directly, or add a follow-up polling/branching path
keyed on `document_id` that handles success and failure before the workflow
completes. Make sure the final result of the flow reflects the document analysis
status, not just submission.
| action>: DFAnalyzeDocument | ||
| display_name>: 'Document Forceでドキュメントを解析' | ||
| provider_id: documentforce_03f3151d6f9accddcffa | ||
| endpoint: 'https://app.aipuncher.com/api/v2/analyse/****************' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔒 Security & Privacy | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
不要把解析 endpoint 直接写进仓库。
Line 21 将外部解析地址硬编码在流程里，环境切换、密钥轮换和最小暴露都很难做；如果这个路径本身携带项目级路由 key，泄露面会更大。这里应改成从 secret 或环境变量注入。
🔧 建议修改
- endpoint: 'https://app.aipuncher.com/api/v2/analyse/****************'
+ endpoint: '${{ secrets.DOCUMENTFORCE_ANALYZE_ENDPOINT }}'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| endpoint: 'https://app.aipuncher.com/api/v2/analyse/****************' | |
| endpoint: '${{ secrets.DOCUMENTFORCE_ANALYZE_ENDPOINT }}' |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@ファイルを取得` at line 21, 该处把外部解析 endpoint 直接硬编码进了流程配置，需要改为通过环境变量或 secret
注入。请在相关配置/初始化位置（包含 endpoint 的对象或常量）移除固定 URL，并改成从配置读取，确保项目级路由 key
不再出现在仓库中且便于环境切换与轮换。
|
🚨 Closed: supply-chain attack attempt. This PR injects malicious files into a trusted open-source repository:
Same user, same payload, multiple repos, same day. User reported to GitHub Trust & Safety. |
2 participants
Pick folder
Summary by CodeRabbit
main分支的提交与拉取请求中自动触发 Datadog Synthetics 测试，执行e2e-tests标签用例，并通过密钥完成鉴权。