Skip to content

Add check for quantified lookaround assertions (W129) - #58

Merged
thatch merged 1 commit into
thatch:masterfrom
jvoisin:la
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

Add check for quantified lookaround assertions (W129)#58
thatch merged 1 commit into
thatch:masterfrom
jvoisin:la

Conversation

@jvoisin

@jvoisin jvoisin commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Flag quantifiers applied to a zero-width lookaround, e.g. (?=a)+, (?!a)*, (?<=a)+, (?=a)?. Repeating a zero-width match is a no-op and making an assertion optional simply disables it, so both are almost always mistakes.

Quantified anchors (\b+, ^?) are rejected by the engine at compile time and never reach the linter, so only lookaround groups are checked. Non-quantified lookarounds and quantified real groups ((a)+, (?:a)+) are left alone.

Includes unit tests covering all lookaround kinds and quantifier variants, in-context matches and the no-flag cases.

Flag quantifiers applied to a zero-width lookaround, e.g. (?=a)+,
(?!a)*, (?<=a)+, (?=a)?. Repeating a zero-width match is a no-op and
making an assertion optional simply disables it, so both are almost
always mistakes.

Quantified anchors (\b+, ^?) are rejected by the engine at compile time
and never reach the linter, so only lookaround groups are checked.
Non-quantified lookarounds and quantified real groups ((a)+, (?:a)+)
are left alone.

Includes unit tests covering all lookaround kinds and quantifier
variants, in-context matches and the no-flag cases.
thatch added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
Renumber check_redundant_noncapturing_group from 129 to 133; it
collided with checks added by #55-#58 (129-132), since all were
written independently against the same base.

Also fix test_run_all_checkers_no_errors: it used (?:x) as a
baseline 'no errors expected' pattern, but that group is now
correctly flagged as redundant by the new check. Switched to a
plain 'x' with no group to keep the test's intent.
@thatch
thatch merged commit 41ff35b into thatch:master Jul 31, 2026
0 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants