extradoc: remove stale REVIEW_LOG.md - #79
Open
cassus wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
REVIEW_LOG.md was a point-in-time code-review snapshot from early April; its
headline finding ("v3 is NOT the default — v2 still is") no longer holds —
reconcile_v3 is now the only reconciler on main and the v2 module / the
EXTRADOC_RECONCILER toggle it describes have been removed. The file is
referenced nowhere and only misleads now, so drop it.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removes
extradoc/REVIEW_LOG.md, a point-in-time code-review snapshot that hasgone stale. Its headline section — "v3 is NOT the default — v2 still is" — no
longer holds:
reconcile_v3is now the only reconciler onmain, and the v2module and the
EXTRADOC_RECONCILERtoggle it describes have been removed. Thefile is referenced nowhere in the tree.
I found the file and started treating it as a current code-review guide before realizing it was out of date and misleading.