CS-424 [Improvement] Include a default justification at all times on the SoA#2921
Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 6 commits into
Open
CS-424 [Improvement] Include a default justification at all times on the SoA#2921github-actions[bot] wants to merge 6 commits into
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
2 Skipped Deployments
|
chasprowebdev
changed the title
Contributor
|
@cubic-dev-ai please review it |
Contributor
@chasprowebdev I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
![cubic-dev-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1082092?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
2 issues found across 8 files
Confidence score: 3/5
- There is a concrete runtime risk in
apps/api/src/soa/utils/soa-answer-parser.ts: callingtrimwithout verifying the justification value is a string can throw on non-string JSON and break answer parsing for affected requests. apps/api/src/soa/utils/constants.tshas a medium-impact fallback gap where many controls can still returnnull, so some YES/default flows may persist without a justification instead of a safe generic default.- Given the two medium-to-high severity issues (6–7/10) with strong confidence, this looks like some regression risk rather than a merge-blocker if those paths are uncommon.
- Pay close attention to
apps/api/src/soa/utils/soa-answer-parser.ts,apps/api/src/soa/utils/constants.ts- parser type-guarding and fallback defaults directly affect justification persistence reliability.
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Fix all with cubic | Re-trigger cubic
Contributor
|
@cubic-dev-ai please review it |
Contributor
@chasprowebdev I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an automated pull request to merge chas/soa-justification into dev.
It was created by the [Auto Pull Request] action.
Summary by cubic
Ensure every SoA control always has a justification by adding ISO 27001 family defaults, a generic fallback when no family matches, and showing/saving them for both Applicable and Not Applicable answers. Addresses CS-424.
INCLUSION_JUSTIFICATIONSandgetInclusionJustification()with ISO 27001:2022 family mapping; when answer is missing/insufficient or YES without a reason, default to a family justification or a generic default if no family matches. Passes control closure into parsing and persists justifications for both YES and NO.getInclusionJustification()mapping.Written for commit 4253d45. Summary will update on new commits. Review in cubic